Vitamin D May not be Crucial: Association between Serum Vitamin D Level and Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension-A Meta-Analysis

Background: The association between vitamin D and pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) remains contentious. The aim of our study was to evaluate the existence of an association between serum vitamin D levels and the incidence of PIH. Methods: We conducted a literature search in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase databases in June 2024 using the following search terms: 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), Vitamin D, 1,25(OH)2D, VD, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D or 25(OH)D, combined with PIH. Two reviewers independently screened the literature based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were then extracted and assessed for quality. Comparisons were made between the highest and lowest categories of serum vitamin D levels. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusted for multivariable effects, were pooled using a random-effects model. A two-stage dose-response meta-analysis was used to evaluate the trends. Results: 17 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 11 prospective studies investigated the relationship between vitamin D levels and gestational hypertension, involving 8834 events and 17,104 participants. The results showed that vitamin D was only marginally associated with hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (summary RR = 0.99; 95% CI: 0.97–1.02; I2 = 67.5%; p = 0.001). However, 6 case-control studies investigated the relationship between vitamin D levels and gestational hypertension, involving 80,814 events and 330,254 participants. The results showed that vitamin D is not associated with pregnancy hypertensive disorders (summary RR = 1.09; 95% CI: 0.84–1.41; I2 = 75.4%; p = 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, the pooled effect of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) showed a slight association with gestational hypertension (pooled RR = 0.99; 95% CI: 0.96–1.02; I2 = 72.6%; p = 0.000). The dose-response analysis showed that increasing vitamin D doses are marginally associated with a decrease in the incidence rate. Conclusions: Our research suggests that the risk of PIH may not be related to the vitamin D levels. Our research supports the hypothesis that gestational hypertension may not be associated with low levels of vitamin D, indicating that the role of vitamin D may not be significant.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ceog5109207
Primary Topic
Vitamin D Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vitamin D May not be Crucial: Association between Serum Vitamin D Level and Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension-A Meta-Analysis

Xiaoyan Huang, Xuelong Li, Yuanqing Cui, Shaochang Jiang et al.
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology
Vitamin D Research Studies
article

Vitamin D May not be Crucial: Association between Serum Vitamin D Level and Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension-A Meta-Analysis

Xiaoyan Huang, Xuelong Li, Yuanqing Cui, Shaochang Jiang, Changxing Cui, Xiaoyan Yao
article en

Abstract

Background: The association between vitamin D and pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) remains contentious. The aim of our study was to evaluate the existence of an association between serum vitamin D levels and the incidence of PIH. Methods: We conducted a literature search in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase databases in June 2024 using the following search terms: 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), Vitamin D, 1,25(OH)2D, VD, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D or 25(OH)D, combined with PIH. Two reviewers independently screened the literature based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were then extracted and assessed for quality. Comparisons were made between the highest and lowest categories of serum vitamin D levels. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusted for multivariable effects, were pooled using a random-effects model. A two-stage dose-response meta-analysis was used to evaluate the trends. Results: 17 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 11 prospective studies investigated the relationship between vitamin D levels and gestational hypertension, involving 8834 events and 17,104 participants. The results showed that vitamin D was only marginally associated with hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (summary RR = 0.99; 95% CI: 0.97–1.02; I2 = 67.5%; p = 0.001). However, 6 case-control studies investigated the relationship between vitamin D levels and gestational hypertension, involving 80,814 events and 330,254 participants. The results showed that vitamin D is not associated with pregnancy hypertensive disorders (summary RR = 1.09; 95% CI: 0.84–1.41; I2 = 75.4%; p = 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, the pooled effect of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) showed a slight association with gestational hypertension (pooled RR = 0.99; 95% CI: 0.96–1.02; I2 = 72.6%; p = 0.000). The dose-response analysis showed that increasing vitamin D doses are marginally associated with a decrease in the incidence rate. Conclusions: Our research suggests that the risk of PIH may not be related to the vitamin D levels. Our research supports the hypothesis that gestational hypertension may not be associated with low levels of vitamin D, indicating that the role of vitamin D may not be significant.

Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & GynecologyVol. 51(9)
Qingdao University (CN), Yuhuangding Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Vitamin D Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.