Random Subspace Local Projections

Abstract We show how random subspace methods can be adapted to estimating local projections with many controls. Random subspace methods have their roots in the machine learning literature and are implemented by averaging over regressions estimated over different combinations of subsets of these controls. We document three key results: (i) Our approach can successfully recover the impulse response functions across Monte Carlo experiments representative of different macroeconomic settings and identification schemes. (ii) Our results suggest that random subspace methods are more accurate than other dimension reduction methods if the underlying large dataset has a factor structure similar to typical macroeconomic datasets such as FRED-MD. (iii) Our approach leads to differences in the estimated impulse response functions relative to benchmark methods when applied to two widely studied empirical applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Review of Economics and Statistics
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01510
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Point processes and geometric inequalities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.97
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Random Subspace Local Projections

Benjamin Wong, Didier Nibbering, Viet Hoang Dinh
1 citations
The Review of Economics and Statistics
Point processes and geometric inequalities
0.97
article

Random Subspace Local Projections

Benjamin Wong, Didier Nibbering, Viet Hoang Dinh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract We show how random subspace methods can be adapted to estimating local projections with many controls. Random subspace methods have their roots in the machine learning literature and are implemented by averaging over regressions estimated over different combinations of subsets of these controls. We document three key results: (i) Our approach can successfully recover the impulse response functions across Monte Carlo experiments representative of different macroeconomic settings and identification schemes. (ii) Our results suggest that random subspace methods are more accurate than other dimension reduction methods if the underlying large dataset has a factor structure similar to typical macroeconomic datasets such as FRED-MD. (iii) Our approach leads to differences in the estimated impulse response functions relative to benchmark methods when applied to two widely studied empirical applications.

The Review of Economics and Statistics
Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Point processes and geometric inequalities
0.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.