Mapping data-driven management in accounting: the premise and promise of the debate and how to move beyond

Purpose This paper aims to point to the shift in the temporal orientation, going from reporting on the past to creating insights about the future, which might be suggestive of perennial managerial attempts to push the boundaries of bounded rationality. Design/methodology/approach In this essay, the authors want to critically engage with the concept of “data-driven management” in the context of digitalization. To do so, they sketch the edges of current discourses around the emerging idea of data-driven management and its relationship with the inner workings of organizations from an accounting perspective. They question the often-times supposed objectivity and increased rationality of the concept and instead introduce the idea of becoming “data-curious” (before being data-driven). Findings The authors observe that this push also seems to be accompanied by trends of individualized decision-making and prevailing hopes of technology to solve organizational problems. They therefore suggest that it is valuable for current debates to take a moment to give attention, in practice and in research, to the role of temporality, benefits of collective decision-making and changes in professions (of accountants). Originality/value The aim of this paper is to spark curiosity and engagement with the phenomenon of data-driven management by outlining a novel set of potential future pathways of research and point towards methods that might help studying the questions arising for a data-curious approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/qram-08-2024-0172
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Accounting and Organizational Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping data-driven management in accounting: the premise and promise of the debate and how to move beyond

Martin Kornberger, Dan-Richard Knudsen, Christian Andvik, Clarissa Ruth Marie Schott
5 citations
Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management
Accounting and Organizational Management
2.64
article

Mapping data-driven management in accounting: the premise and promise of the debate and how to move beyond

Martin Kornberger, Dan-Richard Knudsen, Christian Andvik, Clarissa Ruth Marie Schott
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to point to the shift in the temporal orientation, going from reporting on the past to creating insights about the future, which might be suggestive of perennial managerial attempts to push the boundaries of bounded rationality. Design/methodology/approach In this essay, the authors want to critically engage with the concept of “data-driven management” in the context of digitalization. To do so, they sketch the edges of current discourses around the emerging idea of data-driven management and its relationship with the inner workings of organizations from an accounting perspective. They question the often-times supposed objectivity and increased rationality of the concept and instead introduce the idea of becoming “data-curious” (before being data-driven). Findings The authors observe that this push also seems to be accompanied by trends of individualized decision-making and prevailing hopes of technology to solve organizational problems. They therefore suggest that it is valuable for current debates to take a moment to give attention, in practice and in research, to the role of temporality, benefits of collective decision-making and changes in professions (of accountants). Originality/value The aim of this paper is to spark curiosity and engagement with the phenomenon of data-driven management by outlining a novel set of potential future pathways of research and point towards methods that might help studying the questions arising for a data-curious approach.

Qualitative Research in Accounting & ManagementVol. 22(2)
Vienna University of Economics and Business (AT), BI Norwegian Business School (NO), Norwegian School of Economics (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Accounting and Organizational Management
2.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.