A comparative study of AI code bots: Efficiency, features, and use cases

This article thus provides a comparative study of AI code bots, in terms of their performances, characteristics and applications. It looks at how via application of artificial learning and NLP for software development, these bots help in coding, debugging, and optimizing. The work also analyses AI code bots including GitHub Copilot, Tabnine, Replit Ghostwriter, Amazon CodeWhisperer, and others as well as strengths, weaknesses, and versatility of such software depending on the programming language and the development environment used. Although these tools work well in improving productivity, reducing on-task redundancies and forming a more accurate code, they do not contain self-authorization, especially for intricate occasions. The study shows that the employment of AI code bots has advantages and drawbacks that should be investigated further in the future emphasizing on the possibilities of enhancing the filters on errors, the degree of personalization and considering the ethical aspect of employing AI code generation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Science and Research Archive
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.13.1.1718
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Software Engineering Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study of AI code bots: Efficiency, features, and use cases

Mihir Mehta
1 citations
International Journal of Science and Research Archive
Software Engineering Research
0.78
article

A comparative study of AI code bots: Efficiency, features, and use cases

Mihir Mehta
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article thus provides a comparative study of AI code bots, in terms of their performances, characteristics and applications. It looks at how via application of artificial learning and NLP for software development, these bots help in coding, debugging, and optimizing. The work also analyses AI code bots including GitHub Copilot, Tabnine, Replit Ghostwriter, Amazon CodeWhisperer, and others as well as strengths, weaknesses, and versatility of such software depending on the programming language and the development environment used. Although these tools work well in improving productivity, reducing on-task redundancies and forming a more accurate code, they do not contain self-authorization, especially for intricate occasions. The study shows that the employment of AI code bots has advantages and drawbacks that should be investigated further in the future emphasizing on the possibilities of enhancing the filters on errors, the degree of personalization and considering the ethical aspect of employing AI code generation.

International Journal of Science and Research ArchiveVol. 13(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Software Engineering Research
0.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A comparative study of AI code bots: Efficiency, features, and use cases — Mihir Mehta · International Journal of Science and Research Archive (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS