The Politics of Platforms/<i>Pingtai</i>平台: A Chinese Genealogy

Drawing on archival research for a book-length history of Chinese media governance, this essay presents a Chinese lineage of platform, or pingtai, in the fashion of Gillespie’s famous explication of the “politics of platforms.” Gillespie demonstrates that in the mid-2000s, tech companies began to call themselves as “platforms,” to take advantage of the term’s connotation as open and neutral enabler of the ideal market. Taken as global, this rhetorical strategy features frequently in transnational platform studies. The politics of platform in China, however, does not subscribe to the “root paradigm” of liberal capitalism. The invocation of pingtai has a pedigree traceable to the intellectual zeitgeist of the 1980s and state informatization and e-government of the 1990s and 2000s, which projected a distinct imaginary about information technology in relation to social organization. It is these deep-seated normative expectations that are driving the dynamic of platform governance in contemporary China.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communication and the Public
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20570473241280320
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Politics of Platforms/Pingtai平台: A Chinese Genealogy

Angela Xiao Wu
6 citations
Communication and the Public
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
6.79
article

The Politics of Platforms/Pingtai平台: A Chinese Genealogy

Angela Xiao Wu
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Drawing on archival research for a book-length history of Chinese media governance, this essay presents a Chinese lineage of platform, or pingtai, in the fashion of Gillespie’s famous explication of the “politics of platforms.” Gillespie demonstrates that in the mid-2000s, tech companies began to call themselves as “platforms,” to take advantage of the term’s connotation as open and neutral enabler of the ideal market. Taken as global, this rhetorical strategy features frequently in transnational platform studies. The politics of platform in China, however, does not subscribe to the “root paradigm” of liberal capitalism. The invocation of pingtai has a pedigree traceable to the intellectual zeitgeist of the 1980s and state informatization and e-government of the 1990s and 2000s, which projected a distinct imaginary about information technology in relation to social organization. It is these deep-seated normative expectations that are driving the dynamic of platform governance in contemporary China.

Communication and the Public
Harvard University (US), New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
6.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Politics of Platforms/<i>Pingtai</i>平台: A Chinese Genealogy — Angela Xiao Wu · Communication and the Public (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS