Holistic approach for selecting chatbot development tools: combining AHP and TOPSIS methodologies

The proliferation of chatbot development tools presents a significant challenge in identifying the most suitable ones for specific needs. This study addresses this issue by integrating the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to create a comprehensive methodology for selecting chatbot development tools. The study aims to provide a transparent, objective decision-making framework by evaluating tools across multiple dimensions including deployment characteristics, input processing capabilities, dialogue management, response generation, and economic considerations. Utilizing AHP for criteria weighting and TOPSIS for ranking alternatives, the methodology systematically evaluates various tools to identify the optimal choice. Key findings highlight the strengths and weaknesses of different tools, offering insights that guide developers and organizations in choosing the most suitable chatbot development tool aligned with their specific needs and strategic goals. The implications of this methodology are significant, enhancing decision-making processes within technological tool selection and contributing to the fields of artificial intelligence and automated systems development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business Analytics
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/2573234x.2024.2399087
Citations
4
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Holistic approach for selecting chatbot development tools: combining AHP and TOPSIS methodologies

Younes Ommane, Hamid Hrimech, Mohamed Lachgar, My Driss Laannaoui
4 citations
Journal of Business Analytics
AI in Service Interactions
1.39
article

Holistic approach for selecting chatbot development tools: combining AHP and TOPSIS methodologies

Younes Ommane, Hamid Hrimech, Mohamed Lachgar, My Driss Laannaoui
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The proliferation of chatbot development tools presents a significant challenge in identifying the most suitable ones for specific needs. This study addresses this issue by integrating the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to create a comprehensive methodology for selecting chatbot development tools. The study aims to provide a transparent, objective decision-making framework by evaluating tools across multiple dimensions including deployment characteristics, input processing capabilities, dialogue management, response generation, and economic considerations. Utilizing AHP for criteria weighting and TOPSIS for ranking alternatives, the methodology systematically evaluates various tools to identify the optimal choice. Key findings highlight the strengths and weaknesses of different tools, offering insights that guide developers and organizations in choosing the most suitable chatbot development tool aligned with their specific needs and strategic goals. The implications of this methodology are significant, enhancing decision-making processes within technological tool selection and contributing to the fields of artificial intelligence and automated systems development.

Journal of Business AnalyticsVol. 8(1)
Cadi Ayyad University (MA), Chouaib Doukkali University (MA), Université Mohammed VI Polytechnique (MA), Université Hassan 1er (MA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
AI in Service Interactions
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.