Constraining baryonic physics with DES Y1 and Planck data: Combining galaxy clustering, weak lensing, and CMB lensing

We constrain cosmology and baryonic feedback scenarios with a joint analysis of weak lensing, galaxy clustering, cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing, and their cross-correlations (so-called $6\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}2$) using data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Y1 and the Planck satellite mission. Noteworthy features of our $6\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}2$ pipeline are: We extend CMB lensing cross-correlation measurements to a band surrounding the DES Y1 footprint (around 25% gain in pairs), and we develop analytic covariance capabilities that account for different footprints and all cross-terms in the $6\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}2$ analysis. We also measure the DES Y1 cosmic shear two-point correlation function (2PCF) down to $0{.}^{\ensuremath{'}}25$, but find that going below $2{.}^{\ensuremath{'}}5$ does not increase cosmological information due to shape noise. We model baryonic physics uncertainties via the amplitude of principal components (PCs) derived from a set of hydrosimulations. Given our statistical uncertainties, varying the first PC amplitude ${Q}_{1}$ is sufficient to model small scale cosmic shear 2PCF. For DES $\mathrm{Y}1+\mathrm{Planck}$ $6\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}2$ we find ${S}_{8}=0.799\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.016$, comparable to the $5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}2$ result of DES $\mathrm{Y}3+\mathrm{SPT}/\mathrm{Planck}$ ${S}_{8}=0.773\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.016$. Combined with our most informative cosmology priors---baryon acoustic oscillation, big bang nucleosynthesis, type Ia supernovae, and Planck 2018 $\mathrm{EE}+\mathrm{lowE}$, we measure ${S}_{8}=0.817\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.011$. Regarding baryonic physics constraints, our $6\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}2$ analysis finds ${Q}_{1}=2.8\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1.8$. Combined with the aforementioned priors, it improves the constraint to ${Q}_{1}=3.5\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1.3$. For comparison, the strongest feedback scenario considered in this paper, the cosmo-OWLS AGN ($\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}{T}_{\mathrm{heat}}={10}^{8.7}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{K}$), corresponds to ${Q}_{1}=5.84$.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.110.063532
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.98

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constraining baryonic physics with DES Y1 and Planck data: Combining galaxy clustering, weak lensing, and CMB lensing

Vivian Miranda, Hung-Jin Huang, Xiao Fang, Evan Saraivanov et al.
9 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
2.98
article

Constraining baryonic physics with DES Y1 and Planck data: Combining galaxy clustering, weak lensing, and CMB lensing

Vivian Miranda, Hung-Jin Huang, Xiao Fang, Evan Saraivanov, Jiachuan Xu, E. Krause, Kunhao Zhong, T. F. Eifler, K. Benabed
article en
9 citations

Abstract

We constrain cosmology and baryonic feedback scenarios with a joint analysis of weak lensing, galaxy clustering, cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing, and their cross-correlations (so-called $6\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}2$) using data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Y1 and the Planck satellite mission. Noteworthy features of our $6\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}2$ pipeline are: We extend CMB lensing cross-correlation measurements to a band surrounding the DES Y1 footprint (around 25% gain in pairs), and we develop analytic covariance capabilities that account for different footprints and all cross-terms in the $6\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}2$ analysis. We also measure the DES Y1 cosmic shear two-point correlation function (2PCF) down to $0{.}^{\ensuremath{'}}25$, but find that going below $2{.}^{\ensuremath{'}}5$ does not increase cosmological information due to shape noise. We model baryonic physics uncertainties via the amplitude of principal components (PCs) derived from a set of hydrosimulations. Given our statistical uncertainties, varying the first PC amplitude ${Q}_{1}$ is sufficient to model small scale cosmic shear 2PCF. For DES $\mathrm{Y}1+\mathrm{Planck}$ $6\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}2$ we find ${S}_{8}=0.799\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.016$, comparable to the $5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}2$ result of DES $\mathrm{Y}3+\mathrm{SPT}/\mathrm{Planck}$ ${S}_{8}=0.773\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.016$. Combined with our most informative cosmology priors---baryon acoustic oscillation, big bang nucleosynthesis, type Ia supernovae, and Planck 2018 $\mathrm{EE}+\mathrm{lowE}$, we measure ${S}_{8}=0.817\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.011$. Regarding baryonic physics constraints, our $6\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}2$ analysis finds ${Q}_{1}=2.8\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1.8$. Combined with the aforementioned priors, it improves the constraint to ${Q}_{1}=3.5\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1.3$. For comparison, the strongest feedback scenario considered in this paper, the cosmo-OWLS AGN ($\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}{T}_{\mathrm{heat}}={10}^{8.7}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{K}$), corresponds to ${Q}_{1}=5.84$.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 110(6)
Berkeley College (US), University of Arizona (US), Sorbonne Université (FR), Laboratoire Médiations (FR), Stony Brook University (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, University of Arizona
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
2.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.