In sovereignty’s shadow: The limitations of decentralisation under federalism and multilevel approaches to governance

The focus of this paper is to outline how the foundational approach of decentralisation inherent in federalist and multilevel governance (MLG) systems is incompatible with the indivisible nature of sovereign authority. Via an examination of the structural elements of these systems, their strengths and weaknesses, and an evaluation of the concept of sovereignty, this paper posits that the requirement for an identifiable central sovereign power in governance remains immovable, despite attempts to diffuse this power across multiple actors and governing levels. It further posits that attempts to divide this sovereign power ultimately destroy it, creating governing crises by delegitimising and undermining governmental authority across all levels. An evaluation of the evidence presented supports this contention and raises numerous questions that bear further consideration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian and New Zealand Journal of European Studies
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30722/anzjes.vol16.iss1/2.20146
Primary Topic
Political Systems and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In sovereignty’s shadow: The limitations of decentralisation under federalism and multilevel approaches to governance

Irini Vasilakakos
Australian and New Zealand Journal of European Studies
Political Systems and Governance
article

In sovereignty’s shadow: The limitations of decentralisation under federalism and multilevel approaches to governance

Irini Vasilakakos
article en

Abstract

The focus of this paper is to outline how the foundational approach of decentralisation inherent in federalist and multilevel governance (MLG) systems is incompatible with the indivisible nature of sovereign authority. Via an examination of the structural elements of these systems, their strengths and weaknesses, and an evaluation of the concept of sovereignty, this paper posits that the requirement for an identifiable central sovereign power in governance remains immovable, despite attempts to diffuse this power across multiple actors and governing levels. It further posits that attempts to divide this sovereign power ultimately destroy it, creating governing crises by delegitimising and undermining governmental authority across all levels. An evaluation of the evidence presented supports this contention and raises numerous questions that bear further consideration.

Australian and New Zealand Journal of European StudiesVol. 16(1/2)
MIT University (MK), RMIT University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Political Systems and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.