Reflective Questions: Promoting Metacognition Through Discussion Board Prompts

During two semesters, a numerical methods course for mechanical engineering students at a large US southeastern university used discussion board questions to promote reflection and metacognition. The course covered eight chapters, each with a related discussion question. The students could choose to answer these questions and receive 2% extra credit for the course. This was intended to help the students who missed some of the 30 online homework assignments that comprised 15% of the final course grade. The questions were also meant to encourage the students to think deeply and creatively. The students could see other students’ responses after they posted their own. The questions ranged from making a meme, writing a nursery rhyme, and explaining a complex or easy concept. Only 64% of the total possible responses were submitted by students, and there was a small-to-medium practical but no statistical significance between the levels of participation among the high- or low-performing students. The submissions were analyzed and determined to be at the low level of Bloom’s taxonomy. They identified complex topics to inform future instruction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v24i8.7238
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Reflective Practices in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reflective Questions: Promoting Metacognition Through Discussion Board Prompts

Renee M. Clark, Autar Kaw, Guinevere Tiara Lim
1 citations
Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice
Reflective Practices in Education
2.10
article

Reflective Questions: Promoting Metacognition Through Discussion Board Prompts

Renee M. Clark, Autar Kaw, Guinevere Tiara Lim
article en
1 citations

Abstract

During two semesters, a numerical methods course for mechanical engineering students at a large US southeastern university used discussion board questions to promote reflection and metacognition. The course covered eight chapters, each with a related discussion question. The students could choose to answer these questions and receive 2% extra credit for the course. This was intended to help the students who missed some of the 30 online homework assignments that comprised 15% of the final course grade. The questions were also meant to encourage the students to think deeply and creatively. The students could see other students’ responses after they posted their own. The questions ranged from making a meme, writing a nursery rhyme, and explaining a complex or easy concept. Only 64% of the total possible responses were submitted by students, and there was a small-to-medium practical but no statistical significance between the levels of participation among the high- or low-performing students. The submissions were analyzed and determined to be at the low level of Bloom’s taxonomy. They identified complex topics to inform future instruction.

Journal of Higher Education Theory and PracticeVol. 24(8)
University of Pittsburgh (US), University of South Florida (US)
National Science Foundation, American Society for Engineering Education, University of South Florida
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Reflective Practices in Education
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reflective Questions: Promoting Metacognition Through Discussion Board Prompts — Renee M. Clark, Autar Kaw, et al. · Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS