Steve Jobs (2015): Art, The Man, The Machine

The second film in what one might call Aaron Sorkin’s ‘Asshole Diptych’ (following 2010’s The Social Network) Steve Jobs engages with Apple’s controversial founder: a man whose legacy, as Sorkin’s screenplay voices, had more to do with building beautiful machines than being a beautiful person. This article argues that Sorkin’s innovative biopic approaches its complex subject (both Jobs, and Silicon Valley) via the artifice and intricacy of its own screenplay form: the portrait of an imperfect man, as a perfect cinematic machine. Departing from classical biopic’s focus on the narrative of a ‘life’, Steve Jobs’ three-part structure - focusing on three public product releases - aligns with the structural expectations of the classical screenplay, as well as acknowledging its theatrical setting and influence: the idea of Jobs as a performance. In the script’s various progressions and parallelisms, this article shows, Steve Jobs offers a self-consciously aesthetic rendition of a life seemingly ‘fixed’. Recognising that art is more perfect than its subject, Sorkin’s film encapsulates and potentially obviates the contradictions at play in Jobs - not unlike the ‘beautiful products’ for which Jobs is himself recognised.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Panoptikum
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26881/pan.2024.31.05
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital Media and Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.41
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Steve Jobs (2015): Art, The Man, The Machine

Neil Archer
1 citations
Panoptikum
Digital Media and Philosophy
0.41
article

Steve Jobs (2015): Art, The Man, The Machine

Neil Archer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The second film in what one might call Aaron Sorkin’s ‘Asshole Diptych’ (following 2010’s The Social Network) Steve Jobs engages with Apple’s controversial founder: a man whose legacy, as Sorkin’s screenplay voices, had more to do with building beautiful machines than being a beautiful person. This article argues that Sorkin’s innovative biopic approaches its complex subject (both Jobs, and Silicon Valley) via the artifice and intricacy of its own screenplay form: the portrait of an imperfect man, as a perfect cinematic machine. Departing from classical biopic’s focus on the narrative of a ‘life’, Steve Jobs’ three-part structure - focusing on three public product releases - aligns with the structural expectations of the classical screenplay, as well as acknowledging its theatrical setting and influence: the idea of Jobs as a performance. In the script’s various progressions and parallelisms, this article shows, Steve Jobs offers a self-consciously aesthetic rendition of a life seemingly ‘fixed’. Recognising that art is more perfect than its subject, Sorkin’s film encapsulates and potentially obviates the contradictions at play in Jobs - not unlike the ‘beautiful products’ for which Jobs is himself recognised.

Panoptikum(31)
Keele University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Digital Media and Philosophy
0.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.