A Meta-Analysis of the Relations Between Achievement Goals and Internalizing Problems

This systematic meta-analytic review investigated the relations between achievement goals and internalizing symptoms and disorders, namely, anxiety and depression. The number of samples for each focal relationship ranged from 3 to 36. The results indicated significant effect sizes for the relations between mastery-approach goals and anxiety (r = − .10) and depression (r = − .18), as well as performance-avoidance goals and anxiety (r = .25) and depression (r = .16). A significant effect size was also found for the relation between performance-approach goals and anxiety (r = .15), and a non-significant effect size was observed for the relation between performance-approach goals and depression (r = .05). Mastery-avoidance goals were not significantly related to either anxiety (r = .08) or depression (r = − .13). Several moderators representing the conceptualization of achievement goals (e.g., theoretical model), sample characteristics (e.g., education level), and methodology- and publication-based characteristics (e.g., year of publication) were significant, and suggested avenues for future research. These findings herein have implications for intervention programs that could focus on reducing the links between achievement goals and internalizing problems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Psychology Review
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09943-5
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Meta-Analysis of the Relations Between Achievement Goals and Internalizing Problems

Irina Crumpei-Tanasă, Loredana R. Diaconu‐Gherasim, Andrew J. Elliot, Simona Alexandra Zancu et al.
12 citations
Educational Psychology Review
Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
13.58
article

A Meta-Analysis of the Relations Between Achievement Goals and Internalizing Problems

Irina Crumpei-Tanasă, Loredana R. Diaconu‐Gherasim, Andrew J. Elliot, Simona Alexandra Zancu, Laura E. Brumariu, Cristian Opariuc‐Dan, Cornelia Măirean
article en
12 citations

Abstract

This systematic meta-analytic review investigated the relations between achievement goals and internalizing symptoms and disorders, namely, anxiety and depression. The number of samples for each focal relationship ranged from 3 to 36. The results indicated significant effect sizes for the relations between mastery-approach goals and anxiety (r = − .10) and depression (r = − .18), as well as performance-avoidance goals and anxiety (r = .25) and depression (r = .16). A significant effect size was also found for the relation between performance-approach goals and anxiety (r = .15), and a non-significant effect size was observed for the relation between performance-approach goals and depression (r = .05). Mastery-avoidance goals were not significantly related to either anxiety (r = .08) or depression (r = − .13). Several moderators representing the conceptualization of achievement goals (e.g., theoretical model), sample characteristics (e.g., education level), and methodology- and publication-based characteristics (e.g., year of publication) were significant, and suggested avenues for future research. These findings herein have implications for intervention programs that could focus on reducing the links between achievement goals and internalizing problems.

Educational Psychology ReviewVol. 36(4)
Alexandru Ioan Cuza University (RO), University of Bucharest (RO), Ovidius University (RO), University of Rochester (US), Adelphi University (US)
Unitatea Executiva pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior, a Cercetarii, Dezvoltarii si Inovarii
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
13.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.