Heterogeneous Environmental Regulation,Foreign Direct Investment and Green Total FactorProductivity: An Empirical Study Basedon Provincial Panel Data of China

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is a double-edged sword, promoting the economic growth of host countries while also bringing severe environmental issues.The implementation of different types of environmental regulations and the inflow of FDI both impact the growth of green total factor productivity (GTFP) in host countries.How to cope with the relationship between these three factors is vital for developing countries.This paper utilizes panel data from 30 provinces in China for the period of 2005-2020 to analyze the effects of command-and-control, market-incentive-based, and public voluntary environmental regulations on GTFP at the national level and the coastal and inland levels.Furthermore, a stepwise regression approach is employed to explore the moderating effect of FDI on the relationship between environmental regulation and GTFP.The findings provide insights into the coordinated development of the environment, FDI, and the economy.The results indicate that: Firstly, at the national level, the three types of environmental regulations have different effects on GTFP in China.Commandand-control regulation inhibits GTFP growth, market-incentive-based regulation promotes GTFP growth, and public voluntary environmental regulation shows no significant impact on GTFP.Additionally, FDI has a significant moderating effect on both command-and-control and market-incentive-based regulations with GTFP, strengthening the negative relationship between command-and-control regulation and GTFP and weakening the positive relationship between market-incentive-based regulation and GTFP.Secondly, at the coastal and inland levels, command-and-control regulation inhibits the growth of GTFP in inland areas, while market-incentive-based regulation promotes the growth of GTFP in coastal and inland regions.Public voluntary regulation has no significant impact on GTFP in coastal areas but has a negative effect on GTFP in inland areas.Besides, there is heterogeneity in the moderating effect of FDI between the three types of environmental regulations and GTFP.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/188044
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Heterogeneous Environmental Regulation,Foreign Direct Investment and Green Total FactorProductivity: An Empirical Study Basedon Provincial Panel Data of China

Jie Xue, Shan Xu, Zhenyan Li, Liyi Shi
Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

Heterogeneous Environmental Regulation,Foreign Direct Investment and Green Total FactorProductivity: An Empirical Study Basedon Provincial Panel Data of China

Jie Xue, Shan Xu, Zhenyan Li, Liyi Shi
article en

Abstract

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is a double-edged sword, promoting the economic growth of host countries while also bringing severe environmental issues.The implementation of different types of environmental regulations and the inflow of FDI both impact the growth of green total factor productivity (GTFP) in host countries.How to cope with the relationship between these three factors is vital for developing countries.This paper utilizes panel data from 30 provinces in China for the period of 2005-2020 to analyze the effects of command-and-control, market-incentive-based, and public voluntary environmental regulations on GTFP at the national level and the coastal and inland levels.Furthermore, a stepwise regression approach is employed to explore the moderating effect of FDI on the relationship between environmental regulation and GTFP.The findings provide insights into the coordinated development of the environment, FDI, and the economy.The results indicate that: Firstly, at the national level, the three types of environmental regulations have different effects on GTFP in China.Commandand-control regulation inhibits GTFP growth, market-incentive-based regulation promotes GTFP growth, and public voluntary environmental regulation shows no significant impact on GTFP.Additionally, FDI has a significant moderating effect on both command-and-control and market-incentive-based regulations with GTFP, strengthening the negative relationship between command-and-control regulation and GTFP and weakening the positive relationship between market-incentive-based regulation and GTFP.Secondly, at the coastal and inland levels, command-and-control regulation inhibits the growth of GTFP in inland areas, while market-incentive-based regulation promotes the growth of GTFP in coastal and inland regions.Public voluntary regulation has no significant impact on GTFP in coastal areas but has a negative effect on GTFP in inland areas.Besides, there is heterogeneity in the moderating effect of FDI between the three types of environmental regulations and GTFP.

Polish Journal of Environmental StudiesVol. 34(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.