Religious Ethics in a Conflicted Word—On Ethical Motivation between Political Theology and Anthropology

The article seeks to define the concepts of religion and ethics as well as their compound. It does so (1) by asking for the supposed demarcation line between religious and secular ethics and (2) by considering the relation of religious ethics and political theology. Based on the respective findings, the article offers a meta-ethical perspective on the subject by challenging the anthropological backdrop of both secular and religious ethics. In conclusion, it proposes a formal approach to ethical judgment that may function as a discerning method when it comes to the assessment of specific models of religious and/or secular ethics. In this regard, the article provides conceptual thoughts on ethical motivation and the operationalization of ethics on an institutional level.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Religions
Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15091114
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Theology and Philosophy of Evil
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Religious Ethics in a Conflicted Word—On Ethical Motivation between Political Theology and Anthropology

Zeina M. Barakat, Thies Münchow, Ralf K. Wüstenberg
1 citations
Religions
Theology and Philosophy of Evil
4.22
article

Religious Ethics in a Conflicted Word—On Ethical Motivation between Political Theology and Anthropology

Zeina M. Barakat, Thies Münchow, Ralf K. Wüstenberg
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The article seeks to define the concepts of religion and ethics as well as their compound. It does so (1) by asking for the supposed demarcation line between religious and secular ethics and (2) by considering the relation of religious ethics and political theology. Based on the respective findings, the article offers a meta-ethical perspective on the subject by challenging the anthropological backdrop of both secular and religious ethics. In conclusion, it proposes a formal approach to ethical judgment that may function as a discerning method when it comes to the assessment of specific models of religious and/or secular ethics. In this regard, the article provides conceptual thoughts on ethical motivation and the operationalization of ethics on an institutional level.

ReligionsVol. 15(9)
Europa-Universität Flensburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Theology and Philosophy of Evil
4.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.