Glenohumeral Joint Volume Measurement in Patients with Shoulder Instability: A 3D Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Arthrographic Study

<i>Background and Objectives:</i> This study aimed to compare capsular volume in patients with shoulder instability to that in control subjects without instability using magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography. The objective was to develop a reliable screening method with which to assess shoulder volume. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> In 21 patients with atraumatic shoulder instability and 21 controls, thin-slice 3D volumetric MR arthrography sequences were obtained. MR arthrography images were uploaded to 3D reconstruction, and 3D images were generated. From the 3D reconstructed images, volumetric measurements of rotator interval (RI), anterior and posterior capsular (AC, PC) recesses, biceps tendon sheath (BS), axillary recess (AR), and total glenohumeral joint (TGJ) were performed. Individuals with any extra-articular contrast leakage were also recorded. <i>Results:</i> A retrospective study analyzed a patient group of 21 individuals with shoulder instability (mean age 29.52 ± 12.83 years) and a control group of 21 individuals without instability (mean age 35.71 ± 12.77 years). No statistically significant differences were identified between the groups with regard to age, gender, or side distribution. The mean total joint volume was significantly higher in the instability group (29.85 ± 6.40 cm<sup>3</sup>) compared to the control group (23.15 ± 3.48 cm<sup>3</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.0001). Additionally, the mean volumes of the RI, AC, PC, BS, and AR were all significantly greater in the patient group compared to the control group. <i>Conclusions:</i> 3D volumetric MR arthrographic measurements of the shoulder joint capacity can provide valuable insights for clinical follow-up and guide surgical treatment decisions in cases of atraumatic shoulder instability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60091508
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Glenohumeral Joint Volume Measurement in Patients with Shoulder Instability: A 3D Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Arthrographic Study

Veysel Uludağ, Mehmet Arıcan, Hayri Oğul, Derya Güçlü et al.
1 citations
Medicina
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
0.57
article

Glenohumeral Joint Volume Measurement in Patients with Shoulder Instability: A 3D Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Arthrographic Study

Veysel Uludağ, Mehmet Arıcan, Hayri Oğul, Derya Güçlü, Elif Nisa Ünlü, Oğuzhan Acar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives:</i> This study aimed to compare capsular volume in patients with shoulder instability to that in control subjects without instability using magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography. The objective was to develop a reliable screening method with which to assess shoulder volume. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> In 21 patients with atraumatic shoulder instability and 21 controls, thin-slice 3D volumetric MR arthrography sequences were obtained. MR arthrography images were uploaded to 3D reconstruction, and 3D images were generated. From the 3D reconstructed images, volumetric measurements of rotator interval (RI), anterior and posterior capsular (AC, PC) recesses, biceps tendon sheath (BS), axillary recess (AR), and total glenohumeral joint (TGJ) were performed. Individuals with any extra-articular contrast leakage were also recorded. <i>Results:</i> A retrospective study analyzed a patient group of 21 individuals with shoulder instability (mean age 29.52 ± 12.83 years) and a control group of 21 individuals without instability (mean age 35.71 ± 12.77 years). No statistically significant differences were identified between the groups with regard to age, gender, or side distribution. The mean total joint volume was significantly higher in the instability group (29.85 ± 6.40 cm<sup>3</sup>) compared to the control group (23.15 ± 3.48 cm<sup>3</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.0001). Additionally, the mean volumes of the RI, AC, PC, BS, and AR were all significantly greater in the patient group compared to the control group. <i>Conclusions:</i> 3D volumetric MR arthrographic measurements of the shoulder joint capacity can provide valuable insights for clinical follow-up and guide surgical treatment decisions in cases of atraumatic shoulder instability.

MedicinaVol. 60(9)
Düzce Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.