Knowledge, attitude, and practice of patients, health care practitioners, and road-traffic safety regulators on patients’ return to driving policy after recovery from musculoskeletal disorders

Background: Returning to driving is a major concern for many individuals who had developed the driving skill before injury or disease. This study evaluated the knowledge, attitude, and practice of patients, health care practitioners, and road-traffic safety regulators on patients’ return to driving policy after recovery from musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). Methods: The study was a cross-sectional design. Participants were aged 18–80 years and comprised patients recovering from MSDs, health care practitioners, and road-traffic safety regulators. Questionnaires were distributed to patients who were managed for MSDs, health care practitioners involved in the management of MSDs, and road-traffic safety regulators. Questionnaires seeking relevant information on knowledge, attitude, and practice of patients’ return to driving for each category of participants were distributed in this wise: 320 questionnaires to patients, 355 to health care practitioners, and 300 to road-traffic safety regulators. Descriptive statistics of frequency and percentages were used to summarize the data, while χ 2 was used to analyze associations among variables at P < 0.05. Results: The health care practitioners’ knowledge of return to driving policy after MSDs was fair (125, 41.8%); however, with a good practice score (259, 86.6%). Both the health care practitioners and road-traffic safety regulators had positive attitudes. The patients exhibited poor knowledge (122, 60.7%), negative attitude (126, 62.4%), and poor practice (160, 79.6%) toward return to driving regulation ( P = 0.0001). One hundred seventy-four (58.2%) of the health care practitioner respondents reported determining patients’ return to driving after MSDs, while 137 (68.2%) patient respondents recommended health care practitioners and road-traffic safety regulators collaboration in patient’s return to driving. Conclusions: Return to driving policy after recovery from MSDs is a collaborative effort hinged on health care practitioners’ evaluation and a driving retest by the road-traffic safety regulators. Health care practitioners and road-traffic safety regulators have good to fair knowledge of patients return to driving policy, while patients have poor knowledge and negative attitudes to return to driving.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/ph9.0000000000000044
Primary Topic
Older Adults Driving Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge, attitude, and practice of patients, health care practitioners, and road-traffic safety regulators on patients’ return to driving policy after recovery from musculoskeletal disorders

Saturday Nicholas Oghumu, Udoka Okafor, Sunday Rufus Akinbo, Daniel Olufemi Odebiyi
Journal of the International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Older Adults Driving Studies
article

Knowledge, attitude, and practice of patients, health care practitioners, and road-traffic safety regulators on patients’ return to driving policy after recovery from musculoskeletal disorders

Saturday Nicholas Oghumu, Udoka Okafor, Sunday Rufus Akinbo, Daniel Olufemi Odebiyi
article en

Abstract

Background: Returning to driving is a major concern for many individuals who had developed the driving skill before injury or disease. This study evaluated the knowledge, attitude, and practice of patients, health care practitioners, and road-traffic safety regulators on patients’ return to driving policy after recovery from musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). Methods: The study was a cross-sectional design. Participants were aged 18–80 years and comprised patients recovering from MSDs, health care practitioners, and road-traffic safety regulators. Questionnaires were distributed to patients who were managed for MSDs, health care practitioners involved in the management of MSDs, and road-traffic safety regulators. Questionnaires seeking relevant information on knowledge, attitude, and practice of patients’ return to driving for each category of participants were distributed in this wise: 320 questionnaires to patients, 355 to health care practitioners, and 300 to road-traffic safety regulators. Descriptive statistics of frequency and percentages were used to summarize the data, while χ 2 was used to analyze associations among variables at P < 0.05. Results: The health care practitioners’ knowledge of return to driving policy after MSDs was fair (125, 41.8%); however, with a good practice score (259, 86.6%). Both the health care practitioners and road-traffic safety regulators had positive attitudes. The patients exhibited poor knowledge (122, 60.7%), negative attitude (126, 62.4%), and poor practice (160, 79.6%) toward return to driving regulation ( P = 0.0001). One hundred seventy-four (58.2%) of the health care practitioner respondents reported determining patients’ return to driving after MSDs, while 137 (68.2%) patient respondents recommended health care practitioners and road-traffic safety regulators collaboration in patient’s return to driving. Conclusions: Return to driving policy after recovery from MSDs is a collaborative effort hinged on health care practitioners’ evaluation and a driving retest by the road-traffic safety regulators. Health care practitioners and road-traffic safety regulators have good to fair knowledge of patients return to driving policy, while patients have poor knowledge and negative attitudes to return to driving.

Journal of the International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation MedicineVol. 7(4)
University of Lagos (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Older Adults Driving Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.