The comparison study of PI and Sliding Mode control techniques for Buck-Boost converters

This paper compares the performance of a Sliding Mode Control (SMC) and Proportional-Integral (PI) controller under different voltage and load conditions. The study's findings underscore the need to account for load variations in system designs and to continuously seek system optimization irrespective of the controller type chosen. PI controller demonstrates effectiveness under certain circumstances. However, significant drops in voltage and current during abrupt load changes are obtained. On the other hand, SMC enables superior adaptability, efficiently managing voltage transients and load variations without any electrical disturbances, thereby maintaining system stability. A comparative analysis further emphasizes the SMC's superior time response and robustness against reference voltage changes. Consequently, SMC is proven to be a preferable choice over the PI controller in systems experiencing frequent voltage and load variations. However, both controllers achieve the potential for further response time optimization and stability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi
Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.28948/ngumuh.1459414
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced DC-DC Converters
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The comparison study of PI and Sliding Mode control techniques for Buck-Boost converters

Yasin Bektaş, Zafer Civelek, Enes Bektaş, Mustafa Teke et al.
1 citations
Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi
Advanced DC-DC Converters
0.21
article

The comparison study of PI and Sliding Mode control techniques for Buck-Boost converters

Yasin Bektaş, Zafer Civelek, Enes Bektaş, Mustafa Teke, Salah Hilo Mohammed Al-attwani, Ethar Sulaiman Yaseen Yaseen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper compares the performance of a Sliding Mode Control (SMC) and Proportional-Integral (PI) controller under different voltage and load conditions. The study's findings underscore the need to account for load variations in system designs and to continuously seek system optimization irrespective of the controller type chosen. PI controller demonstrates effectiveness under certain circumstances. However, significant drops in voltage and current during abrupt load changes are obtained. On the other hand, SMC enables superior adaptability, efficiently managing voltage transients and load variations without any electrical disturbances, thereby maintaining system stability. A comparative analysis further emphasizes the SMC's superior time response and robustness against reference voltage changes. Consequently, SMC is proven to be a preferable choice over the PI controller in systems experiencing frequent voltage and load variations. However, both controllers achieve the potential for further response time optimization and stability.

Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi
Aksaray University (TR), Çankırı Karatekin University (TR), Middle Technical University (IQ)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Advanced DC-DC Converters
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The comparison study of PI and Sliding Mode control techniques for Buck-Boost converters — Yasin Bektaş, Zafer Civelek, et al. · Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS