A Comparative Study of Energy Performance Certificates across Europe

Using a sample of buildings across chosen European countries, this study compares different EPC frameworks in terms of their published methodologies and generated outputs. The work demonstrates that, despite all emanating from a common central point of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive, EPC frameworks across Europe exhibit clear differences in their methodologies, use of inputs/outputs, assessment processes, and assessor protocols. A process is proposed for comparing EPCs of a building when utilising EPC frameworks from different countries, whilst noting that direct comparisons of fundamentally different processes can be challenging and itself requires a designed methodology. When applying this process, EPC ratings can appear similar (when comparing EPCs designed for similar climate zones) in many buildings, but this can underestimate the differences in generating those EPC ratings in the first place. As further innovations are designed for EPCs at the EU level, this study demonstrates why incorporating a bottom-up understanding of country-specific EPCs will be necessary for successful implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14092906
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study of Energy Performance Certificates across Europe

David Jenkins, Norberto Fueyo, Antonio López Gómez, Mahsa Sayfikar
4 citations
Buildings
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
1.06
article

A Comparative Study of Energy Performance Certificates across Europe

David Jenkins, Norberto Fueyo, Antonio López Gómez, Mahsa Sayfikar
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Using a sample of buildings across chosen European countries, this study compares different EPC frameworks in terms of their published methodologies and generated outputs. The work demonstrates that, despite all emanating from a common central point of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive, EPC frameworks across Europe exhibit clear differences in their methodologies, use of inputs/outputs, assessment processes, and assessor protocols. A process is proposed for comparing EPCs of a building when utilising EPC frameworks from different countries, whilst noting that direct comparisons of fundamentally different processes can be challenging and itself requires a designed methodology. When applying this process, EPC ratings can appear similar (when comparing EPCs designed for similar climate zones) in many buildings, but this can underestimate the differences in generating those EPC ratings in the first place. As further innovations are designed for EPCs at the EU level, this study demonstrates why incorporating a bottom-up understanding of country-specific EPCs will be necessary for successful implementation.

BuildingsVol. 14(9)
Universidad de Zaragoza (ES), Heriot-Watt University (GB)
HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
1.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.