Normal state quantum geometry and superconducting domes in (111) oxide interfaces

We theoretically investigate the influence of the normal state quantum geometry on the superconducting phase in (111)-oriented oxide interfaces and discuss some of the implications for the ${\text{LaAlO}}_{3}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{\text{SrTiO}}_{3}$ (LAO-STO) heterostructure. From a tight-binding modeling of the interface, we derive a two-band low-energy model, allowing us to analytically compute the quantum geometry and giving us access to the superfluid weight, as well as to showcase the role of two particular relevant energy scales. One is given by the trigonal crystal field which stems from the local trigonal symmetry at the interface, and the other one is due to orbital mixing at the interface. Our calculations indicate that the variation of the superfluid weight with the chemical potential $\ensuremath{\mu}$ is controlled by the quantum geometry in the low-$\ensuremath{\mu}$ limit where it presents a dome. At higher values of $\ensuremath{\mu}$ the conventional contribution dominates. To make quantitative comparisons between our results and experimental findings, we rely on an experimentally observed global reduction of the superfluid weight that we apply to both the conventional and geometric contributions. Furthermore, an experimentally measured nonmonotonic variation of $\ensuremath{\mu}$ with the gate voltage ${V}_{g}$ is taken into account and yields a two-dome scenario for the superconducting critical temperature as a function of ${V}_{g}$. The observed dome in the low-${V}_{g}$ regime is explained by the nonmonotonic evolution of a dominant conventional part of the superfluid density. In contrast, the expected second dome at larger values of ${V}_{g}$ limit would be due to a dominant quantum-geometric contribution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. B./Physical review. B
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.110.104512
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Normal state quantum geometry and superconducting domes in (111) oxide interfaces

M. Gabay, Florian Simon, Mark O. Goerbig
1 citations
Physical review. B./Physical review. B
Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
0.12
article

Normal state quantum geometry and superconducting domes in (111) oxide interfaces

M. Gabay, Florian Simon, Mark O. Goerbig
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We theoretically investigate the influence of the normal state quantum geometry on the superconducting phase in (111)-oriented oxide interfaces and discuss some of the implications for the ${\text{LaAlO}}_{3}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{\text{SrTiO}}_{3}$ (LAO-STO) heterostructure. From a tight-binding modeling of the interface, we derive a two-band low-energy model, allowing us to analytically compute the quantum geometry and giving us access to the superfluid weight, as well as to showcase the role of two particular relevant energy scales. One is given by the trigonal crystal field which stems from the local trigonal symmetry at the interface, and the other one is due to orbital mixing at the interface. Our calculations indicate that the variation of the superfluid weight with the chemical potential $\ensuremath{\mu}$ is controlled by the quantum geometry in the low-$\ensuremath{\mu}$ limit where it presents a dome. At higher values of $\ensuremath{\mu}$ the conventional contribution dominates. To make quantitative comparisons between our results and experimental findings, we rely on an experimentally observed global reduction of the superfluid weight that we apply to both the conventional and geometric contributions. Furthermore, an experimentally measured nonmonotonic variation of $\ensuremath{\mu}$ with the gate voltage ${V}_{g}$ is taken into account and yields a two-dome scenario for the superconducting critical temperature as a function of ${V}_{g}$. The observed dome in the low-${V}_{g}$ regime is explained by the nonmonotonic evolution of a dominant conventional part of the superfluid density. In contrast, the expected second dome at larger values of ${V}_{g}$ limit would be due to a dominant quantum-geometric contribution.

Physical review. B./Physical review. BVol. 110(10)
Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Laboratoire de physique des Solides (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
0.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.