The Culture War and Partisan Polarization: State Political Parties, 1960–2018

Abstract Partisan polarization on “culture war” issues has become a defining feature of contemporary American politics. This was not always the case; for the first two-thirds of the twentieth century, social issues such as abortion and LGBTQ rights played no role in politics. Where and when did the partisan divide begin? Did the initiative come from state or national parties? Was there a critical moment, or was position change incremental? We have constructed an original database of nearly 2,000 state party platforms from 1960 to 2018. These platforms allow us to trace position-taking on these issues and generate estimates of platform ideology. By the time national parties took positions, we show, they lagged state-level position-taking. Contrary to long-held assumptions, we show that state party system polarization did not occur around any critical moment but rather was incremental.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in American Political Development
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0898588x2400004x
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Asian Culture and Media Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Culture War and Partisan Polarization: State Political Parties, 1960–2018

Gerald Gamm, Justin Phillips, Matthew Carr, Michael Auslen
4 citations
Studies in American Political Development
Asian Culture and Media Studies
12.87
article

The Culture War and Partisan Polarization: State Political Parties, 1960–2018

Gerald Gamm, Justin Phillips, Matthew Carr, Michael Auslen
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Partisan polarization on “culture war” issues has become a defining feature of contemporary American politics. This was not always the case; for the first two-thirds of the twentieth century, social issues such as abortion and LGBTQ rights played no role in politics. Where and when did the partisan divide begin? Did the initiative come from state or national parties? Was there a critical moment, or was position change incremental? We have constructed an original database of nearly 2,000 state party platforms from 1960 to 2018. These platforms allow us to trace position-taking on these issues and generate estimates of platform ideology. By the time national parties took positions, we show, they lagged state-level position-taking. Contrary to long-held assumptions, we show that state party system polarization did not occur around any critical moment but rather was incremental.

Studies in American Political DevelopmentVol. 38(2)
University of Rochester (US), Columbia University (US)
Johns Hopkins University
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Asian Culture and Media Studies
12.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.