Mathematical Economics in the Era of Socialism and the Transition to the Market (Part One)

This article is devoted to the study of the history of the Soviet economics and mathematics school, its struggle with official ideology and attempts to influence the choice of strategies for socioeconomic development. During the NEP period, a galaxy of brilliant economists worked in the Soviet Union, who mastered advanced statistical and economic–mathematical methods and obtained a number of fundamental results, which, under favorable circumstances, could have become the basis for Russia’s inclusion in the global stream of economic research. However, the leaders of the emerging trend advocated a rational combination of plan and market, which contradicted the government’s decision to curtail the NEP. The authorities demanded justification for their policies, independent research was viewed as hostile, and the school was destroyed. Its revival began in the late 1950s after the exposure of the cult of personality and proceeded in a fierce struggle against pedantic Marxism. It is shown that this struggle revealed the imperfection of the world economic and mathematical theory of that time, which was focused on the study of market competition and did not consider the mechanisms of rationing, queues, and the black market, typical for a planned economy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies on Russian Economic Development
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s107570072470014x
Primary Topic
Economic Theory and Institutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mathematical Economics in the Era of Socialism and the Transition to the Market (Part One)

Victor Polterovich
Studies on Russian Economic Development
Economic Theory and Institutions
article

Mathematical Economics in the Era of Socialism and the Transition to the Market (Part One)

Victor Polterovich
article en

Abstract

This article is devoted to the study of the history of the Soviet economics and mathematics school, its struggle with official ideology and attempts to influence the choice of strategies for socioeconomic development. During the NEP period, a galaxy of brilliant economists worked in the Soviet Union, who mastered advanced statistical and economic–mathematical methods and obtained a number of fundamental results, which, under favorable circumstances, could have become the basis for Russia’s inclusion in the global stream of economic research. However, the leaders of the emerging trend advocated a rational combination of plan and market, which contradicted the government’s decision to curtail the NEP. The authorities demanded justification for their policies, independent research was viewed as hostile, and the school was destroyed. Its revival began in the late 1950s after the exposure of the cult of personality and proceeded in a fierce struggle against pedantic Marxism. It is shown that this struggle revealed the imperfection of the world economic and mathematical theory of that time, which was focused on the study of market competition and did not consider the mechanisms of rationing, queues, and the black market, typical for a planned economy.

Studies on Russian Economic DevelopmentVol. 35(5)
Central Economics and Mathematics Institute (RU)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Economic Theory and Institutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mathematical Economics in the Era of Socialism and the Transition to the Market (Part One) — Victor Polterovich · Studies on Russian Economic Development (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS