Investigating algorithm review boards for organizational responsible artificial intelligence governance

Organizations are increasingly developing and utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) tools. Responsible AI (RAI) governance approaches including algorithm review board (ARBs) have emerged as important mechanisms to address potential AI risks and harms. We interviewed 17 technical contributors at a variety of organizations about their experiences with internal RAI governance. We summarized the first detailed findings on ARBs in practice, including their membership, scope, and measures of success. We confirmed known ARBs in finance sectors and revealed extensive use of ARBs in health sectors. Our findings suggest that Institutional Review Boards alone are insufficient for algorithm governance and that ARBs are used in tandem with other RAI approaches. Integration with existing processes and leadership buy-in were considered critical to the success of internal RAI governance. Financial tensions between profit and the cost of RAI were a major concern for many participants. Future work should explore measurements of success for ARBs and expand analysis of ARBs to other industries leading in AI implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI and Ethics
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00574-8
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating algorithm review boards for organizational responsible artificial intelligence governance

Megan Comfort, Alan Blatecky, Emily Hadley
9 citations
AI and Ethics
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
article

Investigating algorithm review boards for organizational responsible artificial intelligence governance

Megan Comfort, Alan Blatecky, Emily Hadley
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Organizations are increasingly developing and utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) tools. Responsible AI (RAI) governance approaches including algorithm review board (ARBs) have emerged as important mechanisms to address potential AI risks and harms. We interviewed 17 technical contributors at a variety of organizations about their experiences with internal RAI governance. We summarized the first detailed findings on ARBs in practice, including their membership, scope, and measures of success. We confirmed known ARBs in finance sectors and revealed extensive use of ARBs in health sectors. Our findings suggest that Institutional Review Boards alone are insufficient for algorithm governance and that ARBs are used in tandem with other RAI approaches. Integration with existing processes and leadership buy-in were considered critical to the success of internal RAI governance. Financial tensions between profit and the cost of RAI were a major concern for many participants. Future work should explore measurements of success for ARBs and expand analysis of ARBs to other industries leading in AI implementation.

AI and EthicsVol. 5(3)
RTI International (US)
RTI International
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Investigating algorithm review boards for organizational responsible artificial intelligence governance — Megan Comfort, Alan Blatecky, et al. · AI and Ethics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS