Uncovering labeler bias in machine learning annotation tasks

Abstract As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly pervasive, it is essential that we understand the implications of bias in machine learning. Many developers rely on crowd workers to generate and annotate datasets for machine learning applications. However, this step risks embedding training data with labeler bias, leading to biased decision-making in systems trained on these datasets. To characterize labeler bias, we created a face dataset and conducted two studies where labelers of different ethnicity and sex completed annotation tasks. In the first study, labelers annotated subjective characteristics of faces. In the second, they annotated images using bounding boxes. Our results demonstrate that labeler demographics significantly impact both subjective and accuracy-based annotations, indicating that collecting a diverse set of labelers may not be enough to solve the problem. We discuss the consequences of these findings for current machine learning practices to create fair and unbiased systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI and Ethics
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00572-w
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncovering labeler bias in machine learning annotation tasks

Luke Haliburton, Robin Welsch, Jan Leusmann, Sinksar Ghebremedhin et al.
9 citations
AI and Ethics
Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
3.71
article

Uncovering labeler bias in machine learning annotation tasks

Luke Haliburton, Robin Welsch, Jan Leusmann, Sinksar Ghebremedhin, Sven Mayer, Petros Isaakidis, Albrecht Schmidt
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Abstract As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly pervasive, it is essential that we understand the implications of bias in machine learning. Many developers rely on crowd workers to generate and annotate datasets for machine learning applications. However, this step risks embedding training data with labeler bias, leading to biased decision-making in systems trained on these datasets. To characterize labeler bias, we created a face dataset and conducted two studies where labelers of different ethnicity and sex completed annotation tasks. In the first study, labelers annotated subjective characteristics of faces. In the second, they annotated images using bounding boxes. Our results demonstrate that labeler demographics significantly impact both subjective and accuracy-based annotations, indicating that collecting a diverse set of labelers may not be enough to solve the problem. We discuss the consequences of these findings for current machine learning practices to create fair and unbiased systems.

AI and EthicsVol. 5(3)
LMU Klinikum (DE), Munich Center for Machine Learning, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), Aalto University (FI)
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
3.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.