Aligning police practice with hate crime theory: The case for using risk assessments to improve police response to victims of hate

In England and Wales, police forces have been urged to improve their response to victims. Despite this, many victims continue not to report to police, and those that do often report distrust and dissatisfaction with police response. Across the hate crime strands, victims have little confidence in the capacity of police to act empathetically, to respond to hate crime effectively, or to take hate crime victimisation seriously. In this paper, we argue that risk assessments (RAs) represent a useful tool to bridge the gap between the reality of hate crime victimisation and current practice. We suggest that RAs – tools designed to assess a victim’s risk of potential future victimisation – can not only help the police to implement safeguarding but also provide a fuller understanding of the impact and harms of hate crime, so that police have a more holistic perspective. The use of RA may ensure that victim perspectives remain at the centre of police response.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Victimology
Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02697580241279607
Primary Topic
Crime Patterns and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aligning police practice with hate crime theory: The case for using risk assessments to improve police response to victims of hate

Timothy Bryan, Loretta Trickett
International Review of Victimology
Crime Patterns and Interventions
article

Aligning police practice with hate crime theory: The case for using risk assessments to improve police response to victims of hate

Timothy Bryan, Loretta Trickett
article en

Abstract

In England and Wales, police forces have been urged to improve their response to victims. Despite this, many victims continue not to report to police, and those that do often report distrust and dissatisfaction with police response. Across the hate crime strands, victims have little confidence in the capacity of police to act empathetically, to respond to hate crime effectively, or to take hate crime victimisation seriously. In this paper, we argue that risk assessments (RAs) represent a useful tool to bridge the gap between the reality of hate crime victimisation and current practice. We suggest that RAs – tools designed to assess a victim’s risk of potential future victimisation – can not only help the police to implement safeguarding but also provide a fuller understanding of the impact and harms of hate crime, so that police have a more holistic perspective. The use of RA may ensure that victim perspectives remain at the centre of police response.

International Review of VictimologyVol. 31(1)
University of Toronto (CA), Nottingham Trent University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Crime Patterns and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.