Nature of the lunar far-side samples returned by the Chang'E-6 mission
The Chang'E-6 (CE-6) mission successfully achieved return of the first samples from the far side of the Moon. The sampling site of CE-6 is located in the South Pole-Aitken (SPA) basin-the largest, deepest and oldest impact basin on the Moon. The 1935.3 g of CE-6 lunar samples exhibit distinct characteristics compared with previous lunar samples. This study analyses the physical, mineralogical, petrographic and geochemical properties of CE-6 lunar scooped samples. The CE-6 soil has a significantly lower bulk density (0.983 g/cm<sup>3</sup>) and true density (3.035 g/cm<sup>3</sup>) than the Chang'E-5 (CE-5) samples. The grain size of the CE-6 soil exhibits a bimodal distribution, indicating a mixture of different compositions. Mineralogically, the CE-6 soil consists of 32.6% plagioclase (anorthite and bytownite), 19.7% augite, 10% pigeonite and 3.6% orthopyroxene, and with low content of olivine (0.5%) but high content of amorphous glass (29.4%). Geochemically, the bulk composition of CE-6 soil is rich in Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (14%) and CaO (12%) but low in FeO (17%), and trace elements of CE-6 soil such as K (∼630 ppm), U (0.26 ppm), Th (0.92 ppm) and rare-earth elements are significantly lower than those of the lunar soils within the Procellarum KREEP Terrane. The local basalts are characterized by low-Ti (TiO<sub>2</sub>, 5.08%), low-Al (Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> 9.85%) and low-K (∼830 ppm), features suggesting that the CE-6 soil is a mixture of local basalts and non-basaltic ejecta. The returned CE-6 sample contains diverse lithic fragments, including local mare basalt, breccia, agglutinate, glasses and leucocrate. These local mare basalts document the volcanic history of the lunar far side, while the non-basaltic fragments may offer critical insights into the lunar highland crust, SPA impact melts and potentially the deep lunar mantle, making these samples highly significant for scientific research.
Authors
- Guangliang Zhang
- Chunlai Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0817-2742)
- Ziyuan Ouyang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4878-3561)
- Saihong Yang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2380-4338)
- Wei Zuo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9421-7387)
- Xingguo Zeng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8187-2780)
- Qin Zhou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7811-8390)
- Xin Ren (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2418-4495)
- Bin Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9443-8489)
- Qiong Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5866-3160)
- Jianjun Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8747-3334)
- Hongbo Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2584-7139)
- Mengfei Yang
- Dawei Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2268-5632)
- Hao Hu
- Xiangjin Deng
- Weibin Wen
- Xingye Gao
- Yan Su (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1993-0769)
Institutions
- China Academy of Space Technology (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Institute of Geochemistry (CN)
- Space Engineering University (CN)
- National Astronomical Observatories (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- National Science Review
- Published
- 2024-09-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwae328
- Citations
- 165
- Primary Topic
- Planetary Science and Exploration
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 54.70
Funders
- China National Space Administration
- Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences