Efficacy, Safety and Acceptability of a Very-Low-Energy Diet in Adolescents with Obesity: A Fast Track to Health Sub-Study

The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy, safety and acceptability of a 4-week very-low-energy diet (VLED) program for adolescents with obesity. Adolescents (13-17 years) with obesity and ≥1 obesity-related complication were Fast Track to Health 52-week randomized controlled trial participants. Adolescents undertook a 4-week micronutrient-complete VLED (800 kcal/day), with weekly dietitian support. Anthropometric data were recorded at baseline and week-4 and side-effects at day 3-4, week-1, -2, -3 and -4. Adolescents completed an acceptability survey at week-4. A total of 134 adolescents (14.9 ± 1.2 years, 50% male) had a 5.5 ± 2.9 kg (<i>p</i> < 0.001) mean weight loss at week-4: 95% experienced ≥1 and 70% experienced ≥3 side-effects during the VLED program, especially during the first week. Hunger, fatigue, headache, irritability, loose stools, constipation and nausea were most common. Reporting more side-effects at day 3-4 correlated with greater weight loss at week-4 (r = -0.188, <i>p</i> = 0.03). Adolescents reported 'losing weight' (34%) and 'prescriptive structure' (28%) as the most positive aspects of VLED, while 'restrictive nature' (45%) and 'meal replacement taste' (20%) were least liked. A dietitian-monitored short-term VLED can be implemented safely and is acceptable for many adolescents seeking weight loss, despite frequent side-effects. Investigating predictors of acceptability and effectiveness could determine adolescents most suited to VLED programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrients
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16183125
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy, Safety and Acceptability of a Very-Low-Energy Diet in Adolescents with Obesity: A Fast Track to Health Sub-Study

Clare Elizabeth Collins, Natalie B. Lister, Helen Truby, Sarah P. Garnett et al.
6 citations
Nutrients
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
3.26
article

Efficacy, Safety and Acceptability of a Very-Low-Energy Diet in Adolescents with Obesity: A Fast Track to Health Sub-Study

Clare Elizabeth Collins, Natalie B. Lister, Helen Truby, Sarah P. Garnett, Shirley Alexander, Kaitlin Day, Louise Alison Baur, Sarah Lang, Alicia Grunseit, Krista A Varady, Megan L. Gow, Eve T. House, Cathy Kwok, Hiba Jebeile, Susan J. Paxton, Justin Brown, Chris Cowell, Mary-Kate Inkster
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy, safety and acceptability of a 4-week very-low-energy diet (VLED) program for adolescents with obesity. Adolescents (13-17 years) with obesity and ≥1 obesity-related complication were Fast Track to Health 52-week randomized controlled trial participants. Adolescents undertook a 4-week micronutrient-complete VLED (800 kcal/day), with weekly dietitian support. Anthropometric data were recorded at baseline and week-4 and side-effects at day 3-4, week-1, -2, -3 and -4. Adolescents completed an acceptability survey at week-4. A total of 134 adolescents (14.9 ± 1.2 years, 50% male) had a 5.5 ± 2.9 kg (<i>p</i> < 0.001) mean weight loss at week-4: 95% experienced ≥1 and 70% experienced ≥3 side-effects during the VLED program, especially during the first week. Hunger, fatigue, headache, irritability, loose stools, constipation and nausea were most common. Reporting more side-effects at day 3-4 correlated with greater weight loss at week-4 (r = -0.188, <i>p</i> = 0.03). Adolescents reported 'losing weight' (34%) and 'prescriptive structure' (28%) as the most positive aspects of VLED, while 'restrictive nature' (45%) and 'meal replacement taste' (20%) were least liked. A dietitian-monitored short-term VLED can be implemented safely and is acceptable for many adolescents seeking weight loss, despite frequent side-effects. Investigating predictors of acceptability and effectiveness could determine adolescents most suited to VLED programs.

NutrientsVol. 16(18)
The University of Sydney (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), La Trobe University (AU), Children's Hospital at Westmead (AU), University of Illinois Chicago (US), Hunter Medical Research Institute (AU), Monash Children’s Hospital (AU), Ecosystem Sciences (AU), Monash University (AU), University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
3.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.