Oral decitabine–cedazuridine in acute myeloid leukaemia

In a randomized crossover study involving 89 patients with acute myeloid leukaemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy, Geissler et al. compared intravenous decitabine and oral decitabine-cedazuridine. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the two formulations were similar. The clinical efficacy of oral decitabine-cedazuridine was consistent with historical data of intravenous decitabine. Commentary on: Geissler et al. Oral decitabine/cedazuridine versus intravenous decitabine for acute myeloid leukaemia: A randomised, crossover, registration, pharmacokinetics study. Br J Haematol 2024; 205:1734-1745.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Haematology
Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.19769
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oral decitabine–cedazuridine in acute myeloid leukaemia

Courtney Denton Dinardo, Ian Bouligny
2 citations
British Journal of Haematology
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
0.91
article

Oral decitabine–cedazuridine in acute myeloid leukaemia

Courtney Denton Dinardo, Ian Bouligny
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In a randomized crossover study involving 89 patients with acute myeloid leukaemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy, Geissler et al. compared intravenous decitabine and oral decitabine-cedazuridine. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the two formulations were similar. The clinical efficacy of oral decitabine-cedazuridine was consistent with historical data of intravenous decitabine. Commentary on: Geissler et al. Oral decitabine/cedazuridine versus intravenous decitabine for acute myeloid leukaemia: A randomised, crossover, registration, pharmacokinetics study. Br J Haematol 2024; 205:1734-1745.

British Journal of HaematologyVol. 205(5)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
0.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.