Comparison of Fagotti’s index and Sugarbaker’s peritoneal cancer index (PCI) in Predicting Resectability in advanced ovarian cancer

Background: Peritoneal carcinomatosis is a condition manifests in advanced stages of ovarian cancer. The primary determinants of total debulking are the disease's volume and distribution. The procedure known as diagnostic laparoscopy makes it possible to assess the illness. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of two laparoscopic scores—the Fagotti's index and Sugarbaker's peritoneal cancer index (PCI)—in order to reduce the number of needless laparotomies and identify patients who should get neoadjuvant treatment. Methods: This prospective cohort study occurred in Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Zagazig Gyneoncology Unit (ZGOU), Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt on patients with diagnosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis in advanced ovarian cancer. Fagotti’s index and Sugarbaker’s peritoneal cancer index were assessed in all cases.Results: PCI score achieved higher area under the curve (AUC) of 0.920 while Fagotti score had an AUC of 0.823. The PCI score cut-off level for the prediction of resectability was (≥ 15 ) which had a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 80%, predictive value for positive (PVP) = (66.7%), predictive value for negative (PVN) = (88.9%), and (80%) accuracy.Conclusion: Both Sugarbaker’s (PCI ) and Fagotti ’s index are reliable and accurate indices in predicting resectability in advanced ovarian malignancy with Sugarbaker’s (PCI ) being more specific.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zagazig University Medical Journal
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/zumj.2024.319075.3568
Primary Topic
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Fagotti’s index and Sugarbaker’s peritoneal cancer index (PCI) in Predicting Resectability in advanced ovarian cancer

Eman Amin El Gindy, A.H. Elsayad, HUSSEIN M. ABDEL-DAYEM, Salah El Sayed Kamal Shahin
Zagazig University Medical Journal
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
article

Comparison of Fagotti’s index and Sugarbaker’s peritoneal cancer index (PCI) in Predicting Resectability in advanced ovarian cancer

Eman Amin El Gindy, A.H. Elsayad, HUSSEIN M. ABDEL-DAYEM, Salah El Sayed Kamal Shahin
article en

Abstract

Background: Peritoneal carcinomatosis is a condition manifests in advanced stages of ovarian cancer. The primary determinants of total debulking are the disease's volume and distribution. The procedure known as diagnostic laparoscopy makes it possible to assess the illness. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of two laparoscopic scores—the Fagotti's index and Sugarbaker's peritoneal cancer index (PCI)—in order to reduce the number of needless laparotomies and identify patients who should get neoadjuvant treatment. Methods: This prospective cohort study occurred in Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Zagazig Gyneoncology Unit (ZGOU), Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt on patients with diagnosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis in advanced ovarian cancer. Fagotti’s index and Sugarbaker’s peritoneal cancer index were assessed in all cases.Results: PCI score achieved higher area under the curve (AUC) of 0.920 while Fagotti score had an AUC of 0.823. The PCI score cut-off level for the prediction of resectability was (≥ 15 ) which had a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 80%, predictive value for positive (PVP) = (66.7%), predictive value for negative (PVN) = (88.9%), and (80%) accuracy.Conclusion: Both Sugarbaker’s (PCI ) and Fagotti ’s index are reliable and accurate indices in predicting resectability in advanced ovarian malignancy with Sugarbaker’s (PCI ) being more specific.

Zagazig University Medical JournalVol. 0(0)
Zagazig University (EG)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.