Developing Teamwork Skills in Undergraduate Engineering Students: A Comparison Between Disciplinary and Cross-Disciplinary Projects

This study contributes to team science and competency development by comparing demonstrated teamwork skills by engineering students participating in disciplinary and cross-disciplinary team projects. Teamwork skills are key competencies necessary to solve complex technical challenges in the workplace. Despite prior efforts to enhance these competencies in engineering students, there is still a lack of empirical research examining the effectiveness of such efforts. This study compares teamwork skills demonstrated by undergraduate engineering students in two conditions: 1) engineering-only teams and 2) cross-disciplinary collaboration with education students. Projects in both settings had similar levels of complexity, scope, team size, and requirements. The differences in teamwork skills were investigated using a mixed methods approach with a main quantitative phase, followed by a secondary qualitative analysis to further examine the nature of the differences. Students in the cross-disciplinary model demonstrated higher levels of teamwork skills than those in the engineering-only condition. Results from this work illustrate how authentic and well-designed cross-disciplinary team projects can facilitate the development of students’ teamwork skills beyond what can be achieved in disciplinary teams, fulfilling an essential ABET requirement and enhancing student preparation to succeed in the workplace.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Education
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/te.2024.3456098
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Team Dynamics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing Teamwork Skills in Undergraduate Engineering Students: A Comparison Between Disciplinary and Cross-Disciplinary Projects

Kristie Gutierrez, Krishnanand N. Kaipa, Orlando Ayala, Minjung Lee et al.
3 citations
IEEE Transactions on Education
Team Dynamics and Performance
1.93
article

Developing Teamwork Skills in Undergraduate Engineering Students: A Comparison Between Disciplinary and Cross-Disciplinary Projects

Kristie Gutierrez, Krishnanand N. Kaipa, Orlando Ayala, Minjung Lee, Stacie I. Ringleb, Francisco Cima, Pilar Pazos, Danielle Rhemer, Jennifer M. Kidd
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study contributes to team science and competency development by comparing demonstrated teamwork skills by engineering students participating in disciplinary and cross-disciplinary team projects. Teamwork skills are key competencies necessary to solve complex technical challenges in the workplace. Despite prior efforts to enhance these competencies in engineering students, there is still a lack of empirical research examining the effectiveness of such efforts. This study compares teamwork skills demonstrated by undergraduate engineering students in two conditions: 1) engineering-only teams and 2) cross-disciplinary collaboration with education students. Projects in both settings had similar levels of complexity, scope, team size, and requirements. The differences in teamwork skills were investigated using a mixed methods approach with a main quantitative phase, followed by a secondary qualitative analysis to further examine the nature of the differences. Students in the cross-disciplinary model demonstrated higher levels of teamwork skills than those in the engineering-only condition. Results from this work illustrate how authentic and well-designed cross-disciplinary team projects can facilitate the development of students’ teamwork skills beyond what can be achieved in disciplinary teams, fulfilling an essential ABET requirement and enhancing student preparation to succeed in the workplace.

IEEE Transactions on EducationVol. 68(1)
University of North Dakota (US), Old Dominion University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Team Dynamics and Performance
1.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.