Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (REMS) Technology for Bone Health Status Evaluation in Kidney Transplant Recipients

<b>Background</b>: A significant loss in bone density and strength occurs during the post-renal-transplant period with higher susceptibility to fracture. The study aims to compare the performance of the Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (REMS) in the bone mineral density assessment with the conventional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in a cohort of kidney transplant recipients (KTR). <b>Methods</b>: A cohort of 40 patients underwent both DXA and REMS examinations on the lumbar spine and/or proximal femur. The paired <i>t</i>-test was used to compare DXA and REMS measurements; the chi-square test was used to compare the prevalence of osteoporosis/osteopenia. The agreement between the two techniques was assessed through Spearman's correlation. <b>Results</b>: As expected, most KTR patients were osteopenic or osteoporotic with both REMS and DXA (86.5% and 81% for the femur; 88% and 65% for the lumbar spine <i>p</i> < 0.05). A modest correlation (r = 0.4, <i>p</i> < 0.01) was observed at the lumbar spine between the T-score measured by REMS and DXA. A strong correlation was defined between REMS and DXA in the femoral region (r = 0.7, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). <b>Conclusions</b>: The study demonstrates the exchangeability of the two techniques on the proximal femur in KTR and a higher diagnostic accuracy of REMS at the spine level than DXA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14182106
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Bone health and osteoporosis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (REMS) Technology for Bone Health Status Evaluation in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Paola Pisani, Stefano Andreola, Ombretta Viapiana, Matteo Gatti et al.
4 citations
Diagnostics
Bone health and osteoporosis research
1.91
article

Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (REMS) Technology for Bone Health Status Evaluation in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Paola Pisani, Stefano Andreola, Ombretta Viapiana, Matteo Gatti, Maurizio Rossini, Giovanni Gambaro, Davide Gatti, Angelo Fassio, Giovanni Adami, Chiara Caletti, Fiorella Anna Lombardi, Pietro Manuel Ferraro
article en
4 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: A significant loss in bone density and strength occurs during the post-renal-transplant period with higher susceptibility to fracture. The study aims to compare the performance of the Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (REMS) in the bone mineral density assessment with the conventional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in a cohort of kidney transplant recipients (KTR). <b>Methods</b>: A cohort of 40 patients underwent both DXA and REMS examinations on the lumbar spine and/or proximal femur. The paired <i>t</i>-test was used to compare DXA and REMS measurements; the chi-square test was used to compare the prevalence of osteoporosis/osteopenia. The agreement between the two techniques was assessed through Spearman's correlation. <b>Results</b>: As expected, most KTR patients were osteopenic or osteoporotic with both REMS and DXA (86.5% and 81% for the femur; 88% and 65% for the lumbar spine <i>p</i> < 0.05). A modest correlation (r = 0.4, <i>p</i> < 0.01) was observed at the lumbar spine between the T-score measured by REMS and DXA. A strong correlation was defined between REMS and DXA in the femoral region (r = 0.7, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). <b>Conclusions</b>: The study demonstrates the exchangeability of the two techniques on the proximal femur in KTR and a higher diagnostic accuracy of REMS at the spine level than DXA.

DiagnosticsVol. 14(18)
University of Verona (IT), Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica (IT), National Research Council (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Bone health and osteoporosis research
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.