Evalution of shear bond strength of brackets bonded using different hydrophobic and hydrophilic adhesives: An invitro study

A review of the long history of orthodontic bonding adhesives shows that many evolutional developments have occurred from the first chemically-cured composite resins to the most recently introduced light-cured color-change adhesives. An ideal orthodontic adhesive should have adequate bond strength while maintaining unblemished enamel after debonding. Therefore, researchers have been working hard to achieve the best quality and gentlest materials for bonding orthodontic brackets. To evaluate the shear bond strength of brackets bonded using four different adhesives in both dry and in moist environment. A total of 80 orthodontically extracted premolars will be selected. They are divided into 4 equal groups of different adhesives which are further sub-divided into 2 group each (dry and in presence of moisture). All the selected teeth will be cleaned and store in saline until it use. All teeth will be mounted on acrylic block. The shear bond strength will be measured by Lloyd’s Universal testing machine. The obtained data will be statistically evaluated using SPSS22 for Windows using ANOVA test at statistical significance. : The shear bond strength of the four groups were tested with Instron universal testing machine; breaking load at which bond failure occurred was recorded and bond strength was calculated. Data obtained was compiled on MS Office Excel Sheet (2007, Microsoft Redmond Campus, Redmond. Washington, United States.)Data was subjected to statistical package for social sciences (SPSS v 21). Statistically significant difference seen between the hydrophobic and hydrophilic adhesives. In the present study we did Tukey’s post hoc test for pairwise comparison of different hydrophobic and hydrophilic adhesives. It show highly significant values. : The greatest bond strength values were achieved with TransbondXT in both dry and saliva contamination condition. These values were significantly greater than those achieved with Greengloo, RMGIC and Aqualine LC. The overall study conclude that TransbondXT was considered the feasible adhesive material for orthodontic bonding followed by Aqualine LC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Orofacial & Health Sciences
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18231/j.johs.2024.026
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evalution of shear bond strength of brackets bonded using different hydrophobic and hydrophilic adhesives: An invitro study

Samkit Sakhariya, Avinash Mahamuni, Tushar Patil, Abhijeet Missal et al.
Journal of Orofacial & Health Sciences
Dental materials and restorations
article

Evalution of shear bond strength of brackets bonded using different hydrophobic and hydrophilic adhesives: An invitro study

Samkit Sakhariya, Avinash Mahamuni, Tushar Patil, Abhijeet Missal, Rajshree Gudhadhe, Megha Vilas Markand
article en

Abstract

A review of the long history of orthodontic bonding adhesives shows that many evolutional developments have occurred from the first chemically-cured composite resins to the most recently introduced light-cured color-change adhesives. An ideal orthodontic adhesive should have adequate bond strength while maintaining unblemished enamel after debonding. Therefore, researchers have been working hard to achieve the best quality and gentlest materials for bonding orthodontic brackets. To evaluate the shear bond strength of brackets bonded using four different adhesives in both dry and in moist environment. A total of 80 orthodontically extracted premolars will be selected. They are divided into 4 equal groups of different adhesives which are further sub-divided into 2 group each (dry and in presence of moisture). All the selected teeth will be cleaned and store in saline until it use. All teeth will be mounted on acrylic block. The shear bond strength will be measured by Lloyd’s Universal testing machine. The obtained data will be statistically evaluated using SPSS22 for Windows using ANOVA test at statistical significance. : The shear bond strength of the four groups were tested with Instron universal testing machine; breaking load at which bond failure occurred was recorded and bond strength was calculated. Data obtained was compiled on MS Office Excel Sheet (2007, Microsoft Redmond Campus, Redmond. Washington, United States.)Data was subjected to statistical package for social sciences (SPSS v 21). Statistically significant difference seen between the hydrophobic and hydrophilic adhesives. In the present study we did Tukey’s post hoc test for pairwise comparison of different hydrophobic and hydrophilic adhesives. It show highly significant values. : The greatest bond strength values were achieved with TransbondXT in both dry and saliva contamination condition. These values were significantly greater than those achieved with Greengloo, RMGIC and Aqualine LC. The overall study conclude that TransbondXT was considered the feasible adhesive material for orthodontic bonding followed by Aqualine LC.

Journal of Orofacial & Health SciencesVol. 11(3)
Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.