The case against stenting the cannulation zone of dialysis access

The indications for stent grafts (SG) placement within the dialysis vascular access include recurrent stenosis at the venous anastomosis of arteriovenous grafts, vessel rupture, pseudoaneurysm exclusion, and intra-stent stenosis. Controversy exists regarding the use of SGs within the cannulation zone due to the theoretical risks of increased infection and stent fracture. While prospective studies are lacking, several retrospective studies demonstrated the safety of SG use within the cannulation area. However, the short-term nature of these retrospective studies makes it challenging to draw any reasonable conclusions about SG's long-term safety profile. The presented case here showed that the accumulative exposure to needle injury during dialysis therapy was associated with fracturing the stent leading to life-threatening skin ulcerations that required immediate surgical intervention. Additionally, this case suggests that deploying SG within the cannulation segment should be reserved for those with poor survival and have exhausted other access options.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiology Case Reports
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2024.08.141
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The case against stenting the cannulation zone of dialysis access

Ammar Almehmi, Ahmed E. Ali, Ivana Boktor, Abduljalil Alragheb
Radiology Case Reports
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

The case against stenting the cannulation zone of dialysis access

Ammar Almehmi, Ahmed E. Ali, Ivana Boktor, Abduljalil Alragheb
article en

Abstract

The indications for stent grafts (SG) placement within the dialysis vascular access include recurrent stenosis at the venous anastomosis of arteriovenous grafts, vessel rupture, pseudoaneurysm exclusion, and intra-stent stenosis. Controversy exists regarding the use of SGs within the cannulation zone due to the theoretical risks of increased infection and stent fracture. While prospective studies are lacking, several retrospective studies demonstrated the safety of SG use within the cannulation area. However, the short-term nature of these retrospective studies makes it challenging to draw any reasonable conclusions about SG's long-term safety profile. The presented case here showed that the accumulative exposure to needle injury during dialysis therapy was associated with fracturing the stent leading to life-threatening skin ulcerations that required immediate surgical intervention. Additionally, this case suggests that deploying SG within the cannulation segment should be reserved for those with poor survival and have exhausted other access options.

Radiology Case ReportsVol. 19(12)
Oakwood University (US), University of Sharjah (AE), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.