Serbia, Georgia, and their Breakaway Regions: Examining the Socio-political Mirror Imagery

The author examines various aspects of historical and socio-po­li­tical developments in Georgia and Serbia with specific emphasis on their breakaway regions (Abkhazia and Kosovo, respectively). It is argued that Tbilisi and Belgrade have been facing some similar issues and dilemmas, which are correlated with their historical experiences, coupled with significant exposure to damaging external inf­lu­ences and shifting trends in international politics and law. Major parallels (and to a lesser degree, dissimilarities) are analyzed through historical and comparative met­hods, with additional contributions from political science theories and practice, while also bearing in mind that analogies cannot be made in absolute, but rather, relative terms. The author deploys the ambiguous “mirror image” concept to point out the interpenetration between these similarities and dissimilarities, that have ultimately resulted in certain comparable outcomes, not only regarding the unfavorable situation in the seceded regions but also, in the context of the two nations’ recent stra­te­gic paths.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
COLLECTION OF SCIENTIFIC WORKS OF SOKHUMI UNIVERSITY
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52340/sou.2022.20.14
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Serbia, Georgia, and their Breakaway Regions: Examining the Socio-political Mirror Imagery

Miloš Petrović
1 citations
COLLECTION OF SCIENTIFIC WORKS OF SOKHUMI UNIVERSITY
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
1.13
article

Serbia, Georgia, and their Breakaway Regions: Examining the Socio-political Mirror Imagery

Miloš Petrović
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The author examines various aspects of historical and socio-po­li­tical developments in Georgia and Serbia with specific emphasis on their breakaway regions (Abkhazia and Kosovo, respectively). It is argued that Tbilisi and Belgrade have been facing some similar issues and dilemmas, which are correlated with their historical experiences, coupled with significant exposure to damaging external inf­lu­ences and shifting trends in international politics and law. Major parallels (and to a lesser degree, dissimilarities) are analyzed through historical and comparative met­hods, with additional contributions from political science theories and practice, while also bearing in mind that analogies cannot be made in absolute, but rather, relative terms. The author deploys the ambiguous “mirror image” concept to point out the interpenetration between these similarities and dissimilarities, that have ultimately resulted in certain comparable outcomes, not only regarding the unfavorable situation in the seceded regions but also, in the context of the two nations’ recent stra­te­gic paths.

COLLECTION OF SCIENTIFIC WORKS OF SOKHUMI UNIVERSITY
Institute of International Politics and Economics (RS)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.