Are All Pictures Worth 1,000 Words? An Investigation of Fit Between Graph Type and Performance on Accounting Data Analytics Tasks

ABSTRACT Despite the increasing prevalence of the use of data analytics and visualizations in accounting settings, little is known about the relative effectiveness of different visualization formats for tasks such as those involving comparisons over time and those involving evaluations of whole-part compositions. In this study, we examine if there is a difference in decision efficiency and effectiveness between bar and line graphs for a comparison task and between pie and stacked column graphs for a compositional task. We also examine if the component complexity of graphs affects performance. We find that line graphs result in significantly greater decision sensitivity (ability to identify true positives) than bar graphs on comparison tasks regardless of the degree of component complexity. We also find that bar graphs result in significantly greater decision specificity (ability to identify true negatives) and overall accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Information Systems
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-2023-042
Primary Topic
Data Visualization and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are All Pictures Worth 1,000 Words? An Investigation of Fit Between Graph Type and Performance on Accounting Data Analytics Tasks

Shawn P. Granitto, Uday S. Murthy
Journal of Information Systems
Data Visualization and Analytics
article

Are All Pictures Worth 1,000 Words? An Investigation of Fit Between Graph Type and Performance on Accounting Data Analytics Tasks

Shawn P. Granitto, Uday S. Murthy
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Despite the increasing prevalence of the use of data analytics and visualizations in accounting settings, little is known about the relative effectiveness of different visualization formats for tasks such as those involving comparisons over time and those involving evaluations of whole-part compositions. In this study, we examine if there is a difference in decision efficiency and effectiveness between bar and line graphs for a comparison task and between pie and stacked column graphs for a compositional task. We also examine if the component complexity of graphs affects performance. We find that line graphs result in significantly greater decision sensitivity (ability to identify true positives) than bar graphs on comparison tasks regardless of the degree of component complexity. We also find that bar graphs result in significantly greater decision specificity (ability to identify true negatives) and overall accuracy.

Journal of Information SystemsVol. 39(1)
University of South Florida (US), Florida Gulf Coast University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Data Visualization and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Are All Pictures Worth 1,000 Words? An Investigation of Fit Between Graph Type and Performance on Accounting Data Analytics Tasks — Shawn P. Granitto, Uday S. Murthy · Journal of Information Systems (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS