OP025 Incidence and challenges of epidural analgesia administration by trainees in parturients at a Belgian tertiary training center

<h3></h3> <b>Please confirm that an ethics committee approval has been applied for or granted</b>: Yes: I’m uploading the Ethics Committee Approval as a PDF file with this abstract submission <h3>Background and Aims</h3> Epidural analgesia relies on the perception of the loss of resistance for needle placement in the epidural space. The ability to detect the loss of resistance may vary, which can lead to unintended dural punctures. This study aimed to determine the incidence of self-reported technical challenges encountered by trainees during epidural analgesia and whether the year of training predicts difficulty. <h3>Methods</h3> We conducted a retrospective analysis of medical records from parturients receiving epidural analgesia by anesthesiology trainees between March 1 and April 30, 2024. All trainees received theoretical and hands-on simulation training. We documented self-reported technical challenges, bone contact, number of attempts as well as trainees’ level of training and patient characteristics. As per protocol, all patients were assessed for post-dural puncture headache the day after the epidural insertion. <h3>Results</h3> Out of 146 epidurals performed by 26 trainees, 15 attempts (10%) were perceived as challenging, with bone contact in 13 (87%) cases. Thirty epidurals (20%) required at least two attempts and 5 (3% of all punctures, 33% of difficult punctures) needed three or more attempts. Challenging punctures required at least two attempts. The most commonly reported cause of difficulty was obesity with a median BMI of 32.4 kg/m². Interestingly, challenges and bone contact did not correlate with the level of training. No dural punctures were reported. <h3>Conclusions</h3> In this retrospective study, 10% of epidurals performed by trainees were challenging, with obesity being the most frequent cause. No correlation was found between the trainees’ level of experience and the difficulty of the epidural technique.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-esra.24
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OP025 Incidence and challenges of epidural analgesia administration by trainees in parturients at a Belgian tertiary training center

Amy Belba, Leander Mancel, Imré Van Herreweghe, Astrid Van Lantschoot et al.
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

OP025 Incidence and challenges of epidural analgesia administration by trainees in parturients at a Belgian tertiary training center

Amy Belba, Leander Mancel, Imré Van Herreweghe, Astrid Van Lantschoot, Walter Staelens, William Aerts, Sarah Shiba
article en

Abstract

<h3></h3> <b>Please confirm that an ethics committee approval has been applied for or granted</b>: Yes: I’m uploading the Ethics Committee Approval as a PDF file with this abstract submission <h3>Background and Aims</h3> Epidural analgesia relies on the perception of the loss of resistance for needle placement in the epidural space. The ability to detect the loss of resistance may vary, which can lead to unintended dural punctures. This study aimed to determine the incidence of self-reported technical challenges encountered by trainees during epidural analgesia and whether the year of training predicts difficulty. <h3>Methods</h3> We conducted a retrospective analysis of medical records from parturients receiving epidural analgesia by anesthesiology trainees between March 1 and April 30, 2024. All trainees received theoretical and hands-on simulation training. We documented self-reported technical challenges, bone contact, number of attempts as well as trainees’ level of training and patient characteristics. As per protocol, all patients were assessed for post-dural puncture headache the day after the epidural insertion. <h3>Results</h3> Out of 146 epidurals performed by 26 trainees, 15 attempts (10%) were perceived as challenging, with bone contact in 13 (87%) cases. Thirty epidurals (20%) required at least two attempts and 5 (3% of all punctures, 33% of difficult punctures) needed three or more attempts. Challenging punctures required at least two attempts. The most commonly reported cause of difficulty was obesity with a median BMI of 32.4 kg/m². Interestingly, challenges and bone contact did not correlate with the level of training. No dural punctures were reported. <h3>Conclusions</h3> In this retrospective study, 10% of epidurals performed by trainees were challenging, with obesity being the most frequent cause. No correlation was found between the trainees’ level of experience and the difficulty of the epidural technique.

Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg (BE), New York School of Regional Anesthesia (US), Hasselt University (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.