OP065 Epidural morphine vs local anaesthetics after major gynaecological oncological surgery within an enhanced recovery programme: a retrospective audit from a tertiary cancer center in India

<h3></h3> <b>Please confirm that an ethics committee approval has been applied for or granted</b>: Yes: I’m uploading the Ethics Committee Approval as a PDF file with this abstract submission <h3>Background and Aims</h3> Epidural analgesia with local anaesthetics while recommended by enhanced recovery pathways can exacerbate haemodynamic instability. Epidural morphine provides profound analgesia owing to its hydrophilic properties. This retrospective analysis was aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of epidural morphine with that of local anaesthetic infusions after major gynaecological oncological surgery. <h3>Methods</h3> This audit included all open surgeries for gynaecological malignancies lasting for more than 4 hours conducted between June 2022 and March 2024. After ethical clearance, prospectively maintained data from the Acute Pain Service was divided into two, Group L (local anaesthetics) and Group M (morphine), according to the epidural drug regimen. Outcomes assessed included pain scores on postoperative days 1 to 3, need for rescue analgesia, incidence of adverse effects, interruption of epidural drug therapy, vasopressor support beyond postoperative day 1 and length of hospital stay. Students t test and chi squared tests were used where appropriate. <h3>Results</h3> A total of 186 patients were included with 138 patients in Group L and 58 in Group M. There were no significant differences in the mean age, blood loss or duration of surgery. The mean resting and dynamic pain scores and need for rescue analgesia were comparable between the two groups. The incidence of adverse effects and epidural interruption were also comparable. There were no significant differences in vasopressor requirement and length of hospital stay between the two groups. <h3>Conclusions</h3> The analgesic efficacy and adverse effect profile of epidural morphine was found to be comparable to local anaesthetic infusions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-esra.64
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OP065 Epidural morphine vs local anaesthetics after major gynaecological oncological surgery within an enhanced recovery programme: a retrospective audit from a tertiary cancer center in India

Rudranil Nandi, Shikhar More, Srimanta Kumar Haldar, Anshuman Sarkar et al.
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

OP065 Epidural morphine vs local anaesthetics after major gynaecological oncological surgery within an enhanced recovery programme: a retrospective audit from a tertiary cancer center in India

Rudranil Nandi, Shikhar More, Srimanta Kumar Haldar, Anshuman Sarkar, Suparna Mitra Barman, Sumantra Sarathi Banerjee
article en

Abstract

<h3></h3> <b>Please confirm that an ethics committee approval has been applied for or granted</b>: Yes: I’m uploading the Ethics Committee Approval as a PDF file with this abstract submission <h3>Background and Aims</h3> Epidural analgesia with local anaesthetics while recommended by enhanced recovery pathways can exacerbate haemodynamic instability. Epidural morphine provides profound analgesia owing to its hydrophilic properties. This retrospective analysis was aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of epidural morphine with that of local anaesthetic infusions after major gynaecological oncological surgery. <h3>Methods</h3> This audit included all open surgeries for gynaecological malignancies lasting for more than 4 hours conducted between June 2022 and March 2024. After ethical clearance, prospectively maintained data from the Acute Pain Service was divided into two, Group L (local anaesthetics) and Group M (morphine), according to the epidural drug regimen. Outcomes assessed included pain scores on postoperative days 1 to 3, need for rescue analgesia, incidence of adverse effects, interruption of epidural drug therapy, vasopressor support beyond postoperative day 1 and length of hospital stay. Students t test and chi squared tests were used where appropriate. <h3>Results</h3> A total of 186 patients were included with 138 patients in Group L and 58 in Group M. There were no significant differences in the mean age, blood loss or duration of surgery. The mean resting and dynamic pain scores and need for rescue analgesia were comparable between the two groups. The incidence of adverse effects and epidural interruption were also comparable. There were no significant differences in vasopressor requirement and length of hospital stay between the two groups. <h3>Conclusions</h3> The analgesic efficacy and adverse effect profile of epidural morphine was found to be comparable to local anaesthetic infusions.

Tata Medical Center (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.