EP026 External oblique intercostal plane block vs. subcostal transversus abdominis plane block for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective study

<h3></h3> <b>Please confirm that an ethics committee approval has been applied for or granted</b>: Yes: I’m uploading the Ethics Committee Approval as a PDF file with this abstract submission <h3>Background and Aims</h3> Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a minimally invasive procedure, pain may occur in the postoperative period. The subcostal transversus abdominis plane (sTAP) block has been shown to provide effective postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic surgery. External oblique intercostal plane (EOIP) block has also been proposed as a novel technique to provide analgesia for upper abdominal surgeries. Our study aims to investigate the effect of EOIP block on postoperative pain score and opioid consumption in LC compared to sTAP block. <h3>Methods</h3> After Ethical board approval, 80 patients were randomized to receive either EOIP or sTAP block. Bilateral blocks were performed with 20 ml of 0.375% bupivacaine in both groups after the induction of general anesthesia. All groups received standard general anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Patients were evaluated in the PACU and postoperatively at 1st, 2nd, 4th, 8th, 12th, and 24th hours. Pain scores and opioid consumption were measured. <h3>Results</h3> There was no statistical difference between VAS scores at rest and active movement at all measurement times (p&gt;0.05). Opioid consumption in the first 4 hours was less in the sTAP group than in the EOIP group (p=0.039) However, there was no statistical difference in opioid consumption at 24 hours (p=0.215). There was no statistical difference between the groups in terms of rescue analgesia or first analgesic need (p&gt;0.05). <h3>Conclusions</h3> After LC, the analgesic effect of the EIOB block is not superior to the STAP block in terms of pain scores and opioid consumption. EOIB can easily be used as part of multimodal analgesia in LC procedures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-esra.99
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EP026 External oblique intercostal plane block vs. subcostal transversus abdominis plane block for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective study

Erkan Cem Çelik, Ahmet Murat Yayık, Ali Ahişkalıoğlu, Muhammed Enes Aydın et al.
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

EP026 External oblique intercostal plane block vs. subcostal transversus abdominis plane block for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective study

Erkan Cem Çelik, Ahmet Murat Yayık, Ali Ahişkalıoğlu, Muhammed Enes Aydın, Sümeyye Al, Yunus Emre Karapınar, Elif Oral Ahıskalıoğlu
article en

Abstract

<h3></h3> <b>Please confirm that an ethics committee approval has been applied for or granted</b>: Yes: I’m uploading the Ethics Committee Approval as a PDF file with this abstract submission <h3>Background and Aims</h3> Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a minimally invasive procedure, pain may occur in the postoperative period. The subcostal transversus abdominis plane (sTAP) block has been shown to provide effective postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic surgery. External oblique intercostal plane (EOIP) block has also been proposed as a novel technique to provide analgesia for upper abdominal surgeries. Our study aims to investigate the effect of EOIP block on postoperative pain score and opioid consumption in LC compared to sTAP block. <h3>Methods</h3> After Ethical board approval, 80 patients were randomized to receive either EOIP or sTAP block. Bilateral blocks were performed with 20 ml of 0.375% bupivacaine in both groups after the induction of general anesthesia. All groups received standard general anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Patients were evaluated in the PACU and postoperatively at 1st, 2nd, 4th, 8th, 12th, and 24th hours. Pain scores and opioid consumption were measured. <h3>Results</h3> There was no statistical difference between VAS scores at rest and active movement at all measurement times (p&gt;0.05). Opioid consumption in the first 4 hours was less in the sTAP group than in the EOIP group (p=0.039) However, there was no statistical difference in opioid consumption at 24 hours (p=0.215). There was no statistical difference between the groups in terms of rescue analgesia or first analgesic need (p&gt;0.05). <h3>Conclusions</h3> After LC, the analgesic effect of the EIOB block is not superior to the STAP block in terms of pain scores and opioid consumption. EOIB can easily be used as part of multimodal analgesia in LC procedures.

Atatürk University (TR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.