OP050 An observational study comparing the efficacy of ultrasound guided serratus anterior plane (SAP) block vs erector spinae block (ESPB) for postoperative pain management and stress response in patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surger

<h3></h3> <b>Please confirm that an ethics committee approval has been applied for or granted</b>: Yes: I’m uploading the Ethics Committee Approval as a PDF file with this abstract submission <h3>Background and Aims</h3> Early extubation and optimal pain control and minimizing stress response is an important aspect after Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery (MICS). Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) and Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAPB) are recently described techniques for chest wall analgesia. Their role in MICS is yet to be well determined. We tried to assess efficacy and safety of ultrasound guided SAPB compared to ESPB in the management of pain and stress response in patient undergoing MICS <h3>Methods</h3> Patients undergoing MICS for coronary artery bypass grafting were randomly assigned into two groups. Both SAPB group (group A) and ESPB (group B) were given 0.2% of 20 ml Ropivacaine followed by catheter insertion for continuous infiltration at the end of the procedure. The primary outcome measured were changes in VAS Score (Pain) and cortisol levels (for stress response) in both the groups <h3>Results</h3> There was no significant difference of mean VAS score between the two groups. Hemodynamic parameters were stable in both the groups. Stress response in the form of serum cortisol level showed no major difference between the two groups. There was a statistically significant difference in the spirometry values between the two groups. The duration of ICU stay was significantly lower in the ESPB group as compared to SAPB group <h3>Conclusions</h3> Both ESPB and SAPB offer good quality of analgesia in MICS.ESPB is better as it blocks both dorsal and ventral rami of the thoracic spinal nerves and elicits some degree of sympathetic blockade, while SAPB, targets only branches of the nerve

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-esra.49
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OP050 An observational study comparing the efficacy of ultrasound guided serratus anterior plane (SAP) block vs erector spinae block (ESPB) for postoperative pain management and stress response in patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surger

Saikat Sengupta
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

OP050 An observational study comparing the efficacy of ultrasound guided serratus anterior plane (SAP) block vs erector spinae block (ESPB) for postoperative pain management and stress response in patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surger

Saikat Sengupta
article en

Abstract

<h3></h3> <b>Please confirm that an ethics committee approval has been applied for or granted</b>: Yes: I’m uploading the Ethics Committee Approval as a PDF file with this abstract submission <h3>Background and Aims</h3> Early extubation and optimal pain control and minimizing stress response is an important aspect after Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery (MICS). Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) and Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAPB) are recently described techniques for chest wall analgesia. Their role in MICS is yet to be well determined. We tried to assess efficacy and safety of ultrasound guided SAPB compared to ESPB in the management of pain and stress response in patient undergoing MICS <h3>Methods</h3> Patients undergoing MICS for coronary artery bypass grafting were randomly assigned into two groups. Both SAPB group (group A) and ESPB (group B) were given 0.2% of 20 ml Ropivacaine followed by catheter insertion for continuous infiltration at the end of the procedure. The primary outcome measured were changes in VAS Score (Pain) and cortisol levels (for stress response) in both the groups <h3>Results</h3> There was no significant difference of mean VAS score between the two groups. Hemodynamic parameters were stable in both the groups. Stress response in the form of serum cortisol level showed no major difference between the two groups. There was a statistically significant difference in the spirometry values between the two groups. The duration of ICU stay was significantly lower in the ESPB group as compared to SAPB group <h3>Conclusions</h3> Both ESPB and SAPB offer good quality of analgesia in MICS.ESPB is better as it blocks both dorsal and ventral rami of the thoracic spinal nerves and elicits some degree of sympathetic blockade, while SAPB, targets only branches of the nerve

Apollo Hospitals (IN), Apollo Gleneagles Hospitals (IN), Apollo Hospitals (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.