International Sign: Nature and Nomenclature

This article explores the nature of International Sign (IS), a linguistic phenomenon emerging from international deaf interactions. It examines various terms such as Gestuno, cross-signing, International Sign, and International Sign Language, revealing differing perspectives on IS as a lexicon, a language, or a dynamic process. The debate on IS's classification draws parallels with contact languages, lingua francas, and national sign languages. The discussion extends to methodological approaches in IS research, contrasting studies focused on IS as a product with those exploring IS as a process and considering how the combination of experimental and ethnographic studies enriches the understanding of IS's nature. I conclude that despite ongoing debates regarding its linguistic status, the role of IS as a lingua franca indicates a future in which it may gain broader recognition and wider influence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Linguistics
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011724-121636
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Medical and Biological Sciences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

International Sign: Nature and Nomenclature

Annelies Kusters
2 citations
Annual Review of Linguistics
Medical and Biological Sciences
6.55
article

International Sign: Nature and Nomenclature

Annelies Kusters
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This article explores the nature of International Sign (IS), a linguistic phenomenon emerging from international deaf interactions. It examines various terms such as Gestuno, cross-signing, International Sign, and International Sign Language, revealing differing perspectives on IS as a lexicon, a language, or a dynamic process. The debate on IS's classification draws parallels with contact languages, lingua francas, and national sign languages. The discussion extends to methodological approaches in IS research, contrasting studies focused on IS as a product with those exploring IS as a process and considering how the combination of experimental and ethnographic studies enriches the understanding of IS's nature. I conclude that despite ongoing debates regarding its linguistic status, the role of IS as a lingua franca indicates a future in which it may gain broader recognition and wider influence.

Annual Review of LinguisticsVol. 11(1)
Heriot-Watt University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Medical and Biological Sciences
6.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

International Sign: Nature and Nomenclature — Annelies Kusters · Annual Review of Linguistics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS