Optimizing IOL Calculators with Deep Learning Prediction of Total Corneal Astigmatism

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: This study aims to identify the most accurate regression model for predicting total corneal astigmatism (TCA) from anterior corneal astigmatism (ACA) and to fine-tune the best model's architecture to further optimize predictive accuracy. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective review of 19,468 eyes screened for refractive surgery was conducted using electronic medical records. Corneal topography data were acquired using the Pentacam HR. Various types (7) and subtypes (21) of regression learners were tested, with a deep neural network (DNN) emerging as the most suitable. The DNN was further refined, experimenting with 23 different architectures. Model performance was evaluated using root mean squared error (RMSE), R<sup>2</sup>, average residual error, and circular error. The final model only used age, ACA magnitude, and ACA axis to predict TCA magnitude and axis. Results were compared to predictions from one of the leading TCA prediction formulas. <b>Results</b>: Our model achieved higher performance for TCA magnitude prediction (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9740, RMSE = 0.0963 D, and average residual error = 0.0733 D) compared to the leading formula (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.8590, RMSE = 0.2257 D, and average residual error = 0.1928 D). Axis prediction error also improved by an average of 8.1° (average axis prediction error = 4.74° versus 12.8°). The deep learning approach consistently demonstrated smaller errors and tighter clustering around actual values compared to the traditional formula. <b>Conclusion</b>: Deep learning techniques significantly outperformed traditional methods for TCA prediction accuracy using the Pentacam HR. This approach may lead to more precise TCA calculations and better IOL selection, potentially enhancing surgical outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13185617
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Corneal surgery and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.62
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing IOL Calculators with Deep Learning Prediction of Total Corneal Astigmatism

Mark E. Cohen, Avi Wallerstein, Chirag Shah, Guillaume Debellemanière et al.
4 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Corneal surgery and disorders
1.62
article

Optimizing IOL Calculators with Deep Learning Prediction of Total Corneal Astigmatism

Mark E. Cohen, Avi Wallerstein, Chirag Shah, Guillaume Debellemanière, Mathieu Gauvin, Damien Gatinel, Jason Fink
article en
4 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: This study aims to identify the most accurate regression model for predicting total corneal astigmatism (TCA) from anterior corneal astigmatism (ACA) and to fine-tune the best model's architecture to further optimize predictive accuracy. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective review of 19,468 eyes screened for refractive surgery was conducted using electronic medical records. Corneal topography data were acquired using the Pentacam HR. Various types (7) and subtypes (21) of regression learners were tested, with a deep neural network (DNN) emerging as the most suitable. The DNN was further refined, experimenting with 23 different architectures. Model performance was evaluated using root mean squared error (RMSE), R<sup>2</sup>, average residual error, and circular error. The final model only used age, ACA magnitude, and ACA axis to predict TCA magnitude and axis. Results were compared to predictions from one of the leading TCA prediction formulas. <b>Results</b>: Our model achieved higher performance for TCA magnitude prediction (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9740, RMSE = 0.0963 D, and average residual error = 0.0733 D) compared to the leading formula (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.8590, RMSE = 0.2257 D, and average residual error = 0.1928 D). Axis prediction error also improved by an average of 8.1° (average axis prediction error = 4.74° versus 12.8°). The deep learning approach consistently demonstrated smaller errors and tighter clustering around actual values compared to the traditional formula. <b>Conclusion</b>: Deep learning techniques significantly outperformed traditional methods for TCA prediction accuracy using the Pentacam HR. This approach may lead to more precise TCA calculations and better IOL selection, potentially enhancing surgical outcomes.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(18)
Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine (US), Université de Sherbrooke (CA), Fondation de Rothschild (FR), McGill University (CA), École de Technologie Supérieure (CA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Corneal surgery and disorders
1.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.