Efficacy and adverse reactions of arthroscopic medial collateral ligament release for medial meniscus injury: A meta-analysis

The posterior root tear of the medial meniscus has received increasing attention from scholars in recent years, with its incidence rate accounting for 10.1%–27.8% of all meniscal tears. A comprehensive search of eight databases was conducted to identify studies on the efficacy and negative consequences of arthroscopic medial collateral ligament release for medial meniscus damage. Data analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software, following a thorough assessment of the literature quality. A total of seven studies were included in this meta-analysis. Based on the data from these studies, there was no statistically significant difference between the test group and the control group in terms of Lysholm scores [standardized mean difference (SMD): 3.23; 95% confidence interval (CI): −1.61, 8.06; P = 0.191], IKDC scores (SMD: 0.42; 95% CI: −3.54, 4.37; P = 0.837), VAS scores (SMD: −0.48; 95% CI: −1.36, 0.40; P = 0.283), and operation time (SMD: −24.87; 95% CI: −41.68, −8.05; P < 0.01). According to Lysholm scores, IKDC scores, VAS scores, operation time, and adverse reactions, the findings of this research imply that arthroscopic medial collateral ligament release may be favorable to people who have medial meniscus injury. Nevertheless, current outcomes require confirmation by additional studies of excellent quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIP Advances
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0226080
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and adverse reactions of arthroscopic medial collateral ligament release for medial meniscus injury: A meta-analysis

Xi Gao, Chen Li, ZhiWen Sun
AIP Advances
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

Efficacy and adverse reactions of arthroscopic medial collateral ligament release for medial meniscus injury: A meta-analysis

Xi Gao, Chen Li, ZhiWen Sun
article en

Abstract

The posterior root tear of the medial meniscus has received increasing attention from scholars in recent years, with its incidence rate accounting for 10.1%–27.8% of all meniscal tears. A comprehensive search of eight databases was conducted to identify studies on the efficacy and negative consequences of arthroscopic medial collateral ligament release for medial meniscus damage. Data analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software, following a thorough assessment of the literature quality. A total of seven studies were included in this meta-analysis. Based on the data from these studies, there was no statistically significant difference between the test group and the control group in terms of Lysholm scores [standardized mean difference (SMD): 3.23; 95% confidence interval (CI): −1.61, 8.06; P = 0.191], IKDC scores (SMD: 0.42; 95% CI: −3.54, 4.37; P = 0.837), VAS scores (SMD: −0.48; 95% CI: −1.36, 0.40; P = 0.283), and operation time (SMD: −24.87; 95% CI: −41.68, −8.05; P < 0.01). According to Lysholm scores, IKDC scores, VAS scores, operation time, and adverse reactions, the findings of this research imply that arthroscopic medial collateral ligament release may be favorable to people who have medial meniscus injury. Nevertheless, current outcomes require confirmation by additional studies of excellent quality.

AIP AdvancesVol. 14(9)
First Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.