Evaluation of Different ZX Tensile Coupon Designs in Additive Manufacturing of Amorphous and Semi-Crystalline Polymer Composites

The layer-by-layer deposition of molten polymer filament in fused deposition modeling (FDM) has evolved as a disruptive technology for building complex parts. This technology has drawbacks such as the anisotropic property of the printed parts resulting in lower strength for parts printed in the vertical Z direction compared with the other two planes. In this manuscript, we attempt to address these challenges as well as the lack of standardization in sample preparation and mechanical testing of the printed parts. The paper focuses on process parameters and design optimization of the ZX build orientation. Type I tensile bars in ZX orientation were printed as per the ASTM D638 standard using two (2B) and four (4B) tensile bar designs. The proposed design reduces material loss and post-processing to extract the test coupons. Printing a type I tensile bar in the ZX orientation is more challenging than type IV and type V due to the increased length of the specimen and changes in additional heat buildup during layer-by-layer deposition. Three different polymer composite systems were studied: fast-crystallizing nanofiller-based high-temperature nylon (HTN), slow-crystallizing nanofiller-based polycyclohexylene diethylene terephthalate glycol-modified (PCTG), and amorphous carbon fiber-filled polyetherimide (PEI-CF). For all the polymer composite systems, the 2B showed the highest strength properties due to the shorter layer time aiding the diffusion in the interlayers. Further, rheological studies and SEM imaging were carried out to understand the influence of the two designs on fracture mechanics and interlayer bonding, providing valuable insights for the field of additive manufacturing and material science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Composites Science
Published
2024-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs8090379
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.41
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Different ZX Tensile Coupon Designs in Additive Manufacturing of Amorphous and Semi-Crystalline Polymer Composites

Joseph G. Lawrence, Ajay Kumar Kadiyala, Raviteja Rayaprolu
2 citations
Journal of Composites Science
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
0.41
article

Evaluation of Different ZX Tensile Coupon Designs in Additive Manufacturing of Amorphous and Semi-Crystalline Polymer Composites

Joseph G. Lawrence, Ajay Kumar Kadiyala, Raviteja Rayaprolu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The layer-by-layer deposition of molten polymer filament in fused deposition modeling (FDM) has evolved as a disruptive technology for building complex parts. This technology has drawbacks such as the anisotropic property of the printed parts resulting in lower strength for parts printed in the vertical Z direction compared with the other two planes. In this manuscript, we attempt to address these challenges as well as the lack of standardization in sample preparation and mechanical testing of the printed parts. The paper focuses on process parameters and design optimization of the ZX build orientation. Type I tensile bars in ZX orientation were printed as per the ASTM D638 standard using two (2B) and four (4B) tensile bar designs. The proposed design reduces material loss and post-processing to extract the test coupons. Printing a type I tensile bar in the ZX orientation is more challenging than type IV and type V due to the increased length of the specimen and changes in additional heat buildup during layer-by-layer deposition. Three different polymer composite systems were studied: fast-crystallizing nanofiller-based high-temperature nylon (HTN), slow-crystallizing nanofiller-based polycyclohexylene diethylene terephthalate glycol-modified (PCTG), and amorphous carbon fiber-filled polyetherimide (PEI-CF). For all the polymer composite systems, the 2B showed the highest strength properties due to the shorter layer time aiding the diffusion in the interlayers. Further, rheological studies and SEM imaging were carried out to understand the influence of the two designs on fracture mechanics and interlayer bonding, providing valuable insights for the field of additive manufacturing and material science.

Journal of Composites ScienceVol. 8(9)
University of Toledo (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
0.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of Different ZX Tensile Coupon Designs in Additive Manufacturing of Amorphous and Semi-Crystalline Polymer Composites — Joseph G. Lawrence, Ajay Kumar Kadiyala, et al. · Journal of Composites Science (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS