Guidance on the assessment of learning outcomes for those designing procedures and projects – Report of an ETPLAS Working Group

This document provides assessment criteria for evaluation of each of the Learning Outcomes of the Modules specified (in addition to the Core Modules) for those designing procedures and projects in the Education and Training Framework guidance document by the European Commission and endorsed by the Member States Competent Authorities. This Working Group was tasked to produce these criteria by the Education & Training Platform for Laboratory Animal Science, which was funded by the European Commission to this aim. The assessment criteria address knowledge and skills (including critical thinking) expected to be acquired during education and training of persons preparing to design research procedures and projects using animals under the scope of Directive 2010/63/EU. Recognizing the diversity of expertise and experiences of those being educated and trained, we provide two levels of attainment, an ideal response and one that would be acceptable for each Learning Outcome. The balance between ideal and acceptable could be decided by the particular course providers and/or assessors, according to their local requirements. We envisage that the use of these assessment criteria by training providers and accrediting or approving bodies will help harmonize the education and training for those who will design procedures and projects using animals for scientific purposes. In Europe, this may also contribute to mutual recognition of training, and facilitate free movement of scientists.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Laboratory Animals
Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00236772241244527
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guidance on the assessment of learning outcomes for those designing procedures and projects – Report of an ETPLAS Working Group

Kenneth Applebee, David I. Lewis, Johannes Schenkel, Ismene Dontas et al.
3 citations
Laboratory Animals
Innovations in Medical Education
1.63
article

Guidance on the assessment of learning outcomes for those designing procedures and projects – Report of an ETPLAS Working Group

Kenneth Applebee, David I. Lewis, Johannes Schenkel, Ismene Dontas, Martje Fentener van Vlissingen, Derek Fry, K. Marinou
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This document provides assessment criteria for evaluation of each of the Learning Outcomes of the Modules specified (in addition to the Core Modules) for those designing procedures and projects in the Education and Training Framework guidance document by the European Commission and endorsed by the Member States Competent Authorities. This Working Group was tasked to produce these criteria by the Education & Training Platform for Laboratory Animal Science, which was funded by the European Commission to this aim. The assessment criteria address knowledge and skills (including critical thinking) expected to be acquired during education and training of persons preparing to design research procedures and projects using animals under the scope of Directive 2010/63/EU. Recognizing the diversity of expertise and experiences of those being educated and trained, we provide two levels of attainment, an ideal response and one that would be acceptable for each Learning Outcome. The balance between ideal and acceptable could be decided by the particular course providers and/or assessors, according to their local requirements. We envisage that the use of these assessment criteria by training providers and accrediting or approving bodies will help harmonize the education and training for those who will design procedures and projects using animals for scientific purposes. In Europe, this may also contribute to mutual recognition of training, and facilitate free movement of scientists.

Laboratory AnimalsVol. 58(6)
University of Leeds (GB), German Cancer Research Center (DE), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), Heidelberg University (DE), Hellenic Ministry of Rural Development and Food (GR), University of Manchester (GB), Apple (United Kingdom) (GB), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Innovations in Medical Education
1.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.