Forecasting dead fuel moisture content below forest canopies – A seven-day forecasting system

• Novel system to forecast Seven day daily minimum dead fuel moisture content. • Largest spatial/temporal collection of DFMC observations under forest canopies. • Largest validation of machine learning to model DFMC under forest canopies. • Advancement in risk forecasting and resource management for bushfires. Accurate forecasting of forest fuel moisture is critical for decision making for bushfire risk and prescribed burning. In-situ dead fuel moisture content (DFMC) monitoring (fuelsticks) has improved significantly, along with improvements in weather forecasting and spatial representation of forest density. Machine learning (ML) models have also out-performed traditional fuel moisture estimation approaches on open sites, however, these models are yet to be tested on a diverse range of below-canopy conditions using above-canopy weather observations. Even with significant advancements, forecasting DFMC has shown little improvement, as there are notable spatial and temporal problems associated with DFMC forecasting below forest. This research develops and validates a below canopy, 7-day-ahead forecasting system of daily minimum forest fuel dryness (10-h DFMC) that integrates an automated fuel sensor network, gridded weather forecasts, landscape attributes and a ML model (Gradient boosting algorithm; LightGBM). The study area was established across a diverse range of 28 sites in south-eastern Australia, producing the largest below canopy validation of its kind. Fuel moisture was measured half-hourly using 10-hour automated fuelsticks, with five years of observations. The model performance was evaluated on its capacity to predict minimum daily DFMC, and when DFMC conditions were within the burnable (9% – 16% DFMC) and high risk (<9% DFMC) ranges. Long-term sites were validated on a years’ worth of observations, assessing seasonal variability. The complete network of sites showing best performance in the first day of forecast (for both datasets mean R 2 of 0.88 and 0.87; RMSE of 6.06% and 6.07%), with degraded performance to day seven (mean R 2 of 0.63 and 0.52; RMSE of 11.84% and 13.33%). The results demonstrate that accurate DFMC forecasts can be achieved by the newly developed forecasting framework. The proposed system has the potential to be applied in any wildland fire setting where weather forecasts are available.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110217
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.98

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forecasting dead fuel moisture content below forest canopies – A seven-day forecasting system

Christopher S. Lyell, Jonathan Garber, Tom Duff, Tim Gazzard et al.
7 citations
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Fire effects on ecosystems
1.98
article

Forecasting dead fuel moisture content below forest canopies – A seven-day forecasting system

Christopher S. Lyell, Jonathan Garber, Tom Duff, Tim Gazzard, Zaher Joukhadar, Simon J. Mutch, Usha Nattala, Gary Sheridan, Thomas Keeble, Elena Marie Vella, R. C. Joshi
article en
7 citations

Abstract

• Novel system to forecast Seven day daily minimum dead fuel moisture content. • Largest spatial/temporal collection of DFMC observations under forest canopies. • Largest validation of machine learning to model DFMC under forest canopies. • Advancement in risk forecasting and resource management for bushfires. Accurate forecasting of forest fuel moisture is critical for decision making for bushfire risk and prescribed burning. In-situ dead fuel moisture content (DFMC) monitoring (fuelsticks) has improved significantly, along with improvements in weather forecasting and spatial representation of forest density. Machine learning (ML) models have also out-performed traditional fuel moisture estimation approaches on open sites, however, these models are yet to be tested on a diverse range of below-canopy conditions using above-canopy weather observations. Even with significant advancements, forecasting DFMC has shown little improvement, as there are notable spatial and temporal problems associated with DFMC forecasting below forest. This research develops and validates a below canopy, 7-day-ahead forecasting system of daily minimum forest fuel dryness (10-h DFMC) that integrates an automated fuel sensor network, gridded weather forecasts, landscape attributes and a ML model (Gradient boosting algorithm; LightGBM). The study area was established across a diverse range of 28 sites in south-eastern Australia, producing the largest below canopy validation of its kind. Fuel moisture was measured half-hourly using 10-hour automated fuelsticks, with five years of observations. The model performance was evaluated on its capacity to predict minimum daily DFMC, and when DFMC conditions were within the burnable (9% – 16% DFMC) and high risk (<9% DFMC) ranges. Long-term sites were validated on a years’ worth of observations, assessing seasonal variability. The complete network of sites showing best performance in the first day of forecast (for both datasets mean R 2 of 0.88 and 0.87; RMSE of 6.06% and 6.07%), with degraded performance to day seven (mean R 2 of 0.63 and 0.52; RMSE of 11.84% and 13.33%). The results demonstrate that accurate DFMC forecasts can be achieved by the newly developed forecasting framework. The proposed system has the potential to be applied in any wildland fire setting where weather forecasts are available.

Agricultural and Forest MeteorologyVol. 358
The University of Melbourne (AU), Government of Victoria (AU), WA Country Health Service (AU), Ecosystem Sciences (AU)
University of Melbourne, State Government of Victoria
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Fire effects on ecosystems
1.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.