AI fairness in practice: Paradigm, challenges, and prospects

Abstract Understanding and correcting algorithmic bias in artificial intelligence (AI) has become increasingly important, leading to a surge in research on AI fairness within both the AI community and broader society. Traditionally, this research operates within the constrained supervised learning paradigm, assuming the presence of class labels, independent and identically distributed (IID) data, and batch‐based learning necessitating the simultaneous availability of all training data. However, in practice, class labels may be absent due to censoring, data is often represented using non‐IID graph structures that capture connections among individual units, and data can arrive and evolve over time. These prevalent real‐world data representations limit the applicability of existing fairness literature, which typically addresses fairness in static and tabular supervised learning settings. This paper reviews recent advances in AI fairness aimed at bridging these gaps for practical deployment in real‐world scenarios. Additionally, opportunities are envisioned by highlighting the limitations and significant potential for real applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI Magazine
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aaai.12189
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI fairness in practice: Paradigm, challenges, and prospects

Wenbin Zhang
11 citations
AI Magazine
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
5.79
article

AI fairness in practice: Paradigm, challenges, and prospects

Wenbin Zhang
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Abstract Understanding and correcting algorithmic bias in artificial intelligence (AI) has become increasingly important, leading to a surge in research on AI fairness within both the AI community and broader society. Traditionally, this research operates within the constrained supervised learning paradigm, assuming the presence of class labels, independent and identically distributed (IID) data, and batch‐based learning necessitating the simultaneous availability of all training data. However, in practice, class labels may be absent due to censoring, data is often represented using non‐IID graph structures that capture connections among individual units, and data can arrive and evolve over time. These prevalent real‐world data representations limit the applicability of existing fairness literature, which typically addresses fairness in static and tabular supervised learning settings. This paper reviews recent advances in AI fairness aimed at bridging these gaps for practical deployment in real‐world scenarios. Additionally, opportunities are envisioned by highlighting the limitations and significant potential for real applications.

AI MagazineVol. 45(3)
Florida International University (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
5.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.