How many parameters are needed to represent polar sea ice surface patterns and heterogeneity?

Abstract. Sea ice surface patterns encode more information than can be represented solely by the ice fraction. The aim of this paper is thus to establish the importance of using a broader set of surface characterization metrics and to identify a minimal set of such metrics that may be useful for representing sea ice in Earth system models. Large-eddy simulations of the atmospheric boundary layer over various idealized sea ice patterns, with equivalent ice fractions and average floe areas, demonstrate that the spatial organization of ice and water can play a crucial role in determining boundary layer structures. Thus, various methods used to quantify heterogeneity in categorical lattice-based spatial data, such as those used in landscape ecology and Geographic Information System (GIS) studies, are employed here on a set of recently declassified high-resolution sea ice surface images. It is found that, in conjunction with ice fraction, patch density (representing the fragmentation of the surface), the splitting index (representing variability in patch size), and the perimeter–area fractal dimension (representing the tortuosity of the interface) are all required to describe the two-dimensional pattern exhibited by a sea ice surface. For surfaces with anisotropic patterns, the orientation of the surface relative to the mean wind is also needed. Finally, scaling laws are derived for these relevant landscape metrics, allowing for their estimation using aggregated spatial sea ice surface data at any resolution. The methods used in and the results gained from this study represent a first step toward developing further methods for quantifying variability in polar sea ice surfaces and for parameterizing mixed ice–water surfaces in coarse geophysical models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œcryosphere
Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4335-2024
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.75

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How many parameters are needed to represent polar sea ice surface patterns and heterogeneity?

Elie Bou‐Zeid, Linette Boisvert, Mitchell Bushuk, Joseph Fogarty
2 citations
˜The œcryosphere
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
0.75
article

How many parameters are needed to represent polar sea ice surface patterns and heterogeneity?

Elie Bou‐Zeid, Linette Boisvert, Mitchell Bushuk, Joseph Fogarty
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Sea ice surface patterns encode more information than can be represented solely by the ice fraction. The aim of this paper is thus to establish the importance of using a broader set of surface characterization metrics and to identify a minimal set of such metrics that may be useful for representing sea ice in Earth system models. Large-eddy simulations of the atmospheric boundary layer over various idealized sea ice patterns, with equivalent ice fractions and average floe areas, demonstrate that the spatial organization of ice and water can play a crucial role in determining boundary layer structures. Thus, various methods used to quantify heterogeneity in categorical lattice-based spatial data, such as those used in landscape ecology and Geographic Information System (GIS) studies, are employed here on a set of recently declassified high-resolution sea ice surface images. It is found that, in conjunction with ice fraction, patch density (representing the fragmentation of the surface), the splitting index (representing variability in patch size), and the perimeter–area fractal dimension (representing the tortuosity of the interface) are all required to describe the two-dimensional pattern exhibited by a sea ice surface. For surfaces with anisotropic patterns, the orientation of the surface relative to the mean wind is also needed. Finally, scaling laws are derived for these relevant landscape metrics, allowing for their estimation using aggregated spatial sea ice surface data at any resolution. The methods used in and the results gained from this study represent a first step toward developing further methods for quantifying variability in polar sea ice surfaces and for parameterizing mixed ice–water surfaces in coarse geophysical models.

˜The œcryosphereVol. 18(9)
Goddard Space Flight Center (US), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US), NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (US), Princeton University (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Commerce
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
0.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.