THE TRANSLATION OF DENOMINAL -ED ADJECTIVAL COMPOUNDS INTO ROMANIAN – A MATTER OF EXPLICITATION

Typological differences across languages shape the translators’ choice of particular strategies when rendering syntactic and lexical structures that are ubiquitous in the source language, but highly infrequent or non-existent in the target language (Slobin 2004, 2005; Alonso 2018; Capelle 2012; Drăgan 2021; Ibarretxe-Antuñano 2003, et al.). The present article explores the impact of such differences on the strategies adopted to translate English denominal -ed adjectival compounds into Romanian and the extent to which they contrive to compensate for the unavailability of said compounds in the target language. It is shown that their absence from Romanian compels translators to overwhelmingly adopt strategies that spell out the syntactic and semantic relations between the two stems of the original compounds (grammatical transposition, compensation by splitting, compensation in place, compensation in kind). Consequently, all these strategies are analyzed as instances of (obligatory) explicitation, and, thus, lend support to the view in the literature that explicitation is a universal strategy (Blum-Kulka 1986; Klaudy 2003, 2009; Klaudy & Károly 2005; Molés-Cases 2019, et al.).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Analele Universităţii Bucureşti
Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62229/aubllrlxxiii/24/3
Primary Topic
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE TRANSLATION OF DENOMINAL -ED ADJECTIVAL COMPOUNDS INTO ROMANIAN – A MATTER OF EXPLICITATION

Ruxandra Drăgan
Analele Universităţii Bucureşti
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
article

THE TRANSLATION OF DENOMINAL -ED ADJECTIVAL COMPOUNDS INTO ROMANIAN – A MATTER OF EXPLICITATION

Ruxandra Drăgan
article en

Abstract

Typological differences across languages shape the translators’ choice of particular strategies when rendering syntactic and lexical structures that are ubiquitous in the source language, but highly infrequent or non-existent in the target language (Slobin 2004, 2005; Alonso 2018; Capelle 2012; Drăgan 2021; Ibarretxe-Antuñano 2003, et al.). The present article explores the impact of such differences on the strategies adopted to translate English denominal -ed adjectival compounds into Romanian and the extent to which they contrive to compensate for the unavailability of said compounds in the target language. It is shown that their absence from Romanian compels translators to overwhelmingly adopt strategies that spell out the syntactic and semantic relations between the two stems of the original compounds (grammatical transposition, compensation by splitting, compensation in place, compensation in kind). Consequently, all these strategies are analyzed as instances of (obligatory) explicitation, and, thus, lend support to the view in the literature that explicitation is a universal strategy (Blum-Kulka 1986; Klaudy 2003, 2009; Klaudy & Károly 2005; Molés-Cases 2019, et al.).

Analele Universităţii BucureştiVol. 73(1/2024)
University of Bucharest (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.