The pursuit of ‘good’ Internet policy

Abstract As our digital society continues to advance, an increasingly diverse array of scholars, policymakers, civic interest groups, companies and regulatory bodies from around the world are seeking to have an increased say in its governance. This diversity makes the challenge of achieving ‘good’ Internet policy more complex and contested. Of course, the notion of 'good Internet policy' raises several important questions: What defines a good Internet policy? Who is it intended for? How can it be achieved and evaluated? Why is it worth pursuing? The papers in this collection explore a number of issues relevant to this pursuit. They include research into deploying digital systems to increase participation in democratic elections and other e‐governance initiatives, navigating the intersection of local norms and global rules, addressing algorithmic discrimination, confronting the role of conspiracy theories in democratic processes, defining responsibility in content moderation, balancing legal certainty with operational flexibility in platform governance and the potential for data justice in AI governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy & Internet
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.423
Citations
7
Primary Topic
ICT Impact and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The pursuit of ‘good’ Internet policy

Jonathon Hutchinson, Nadia Tjahja, Milica Stilinovic, Joanne Elizabeth Gray
7 citations
Policy & Internet
ICT Impact and Policies
2.24
article

The pursuit of ‘good’ Internet policy

Jonathon Hutchinson, Nadia Tjahja, Milica Stilinovic, Joanne Elizabeth Gray
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract As our digital society continues to advance, an increasingly diverse array of scholars, policymakers, civic interest groups, companies and regulatory bodies from around the world are seeking to have an increased say in its governance. This diversity makes the challenge of achieving ‘good’ Internet policy more complex and contested. Of course, the notion of 'good Internet policy' raises several important questions: What defines a good Internet policy? Who is it intended for? How can it be achieved and evaluated? Why is it worth pursuing? The papers in this collection explore a number of issues relevant to this pursuit. They include research into deploying digital systems to increase participation in democratic elections and other e‐governance initiatives, navigating the intersection of local norms and global rules, addressing algorithmic discrimination, confronting the role of conspiracy theories in democratic processes, defining responsibility in content moderation, balancing legal certainty with operational flexibility in platform governance and the potential for data justice in AI governance.

Policy & InternetVol. 16(3)
The University of Sydney (AU), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), United Nations University Institute on Comparative Regional Integration Studies (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
ICT Impact and Policies
2.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The pursuit of ‘good’ Internet policy — Jonathon Hutchinson, Nadia Tjahja, et al. · Policy & Internet (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS