Explaining interference effects in prisoner dilemma games

Abstract This article presents a new approach to understanding strategic decision making inspired by the mathematics of quantum theory. Empirical support for this new approach is based on five different puzzling findings from past work on the prisoner dilemma game including the disjunction effect, the interference of predictions on actions in simultaneous and sequential games, question order effect, and the effects of cheap promises. Eight different quantum models are described, which purport to account for these puzzling findings. The competing models are systematically compared with respect to their capability of accounting for the five empirical findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Experimental Economics
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-024-09838-w
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explaining interference effects in prisoner dilemma games

Meijuan Lu, Jerome R. Busemeyer, Masanari Asano
1 citations
Experimental Economics
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
0.53
article

Explaining interference effects in prisoner dilemma games

Meijuan Lu, Jerome R. Busemeyer, Masanari Asano
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article presents a new approach to understanding strategic decision making inspired by the mathematics of quantum theory. Empirical support for this new approach is based on five different puzzling findings from past work on the prisoner dilemma game including the disjunction effect, the interference of predictions on actions in simultaneous and sequential games, question order effect, and the effects of cheap promises. Eight different quantum models are described, which purport to account for these puzzling findings. The competing models are systematically compared with respect to their capability of accounting for the five empirical findings.

Experimental EconomicsVol. 27(4)
Indiana University Bloomington (US), Kindai University (JP)
Air Force Office of Scientific Research
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.