Synergistic cotreatment of cooling tower blowdown and produced waters: Techno-economic, sustainability, and optimization systems analyses

A blowdown and produced water cotreatment train design was preliminarily simulated to explore water-energy nexus synergy. This process model was able to provide results concerning water compositions, chemical demand, and energy intensity. The computational expense associated with this simulation made it intractable to use within optimization algorithms for further informative, comprehensive systems analyses. This work details the efforts of developing a framework suitable for the optimization of computationally demanding wastewater treatment train simulations, specifically demonstrated for the cotreatment train’s process, economic, and sustainability models. The unique challenges of the cotreatment train model motivated a modified surrogate optimization methodology to be developed. Using this framework, worst and best case economic scenarios were optimized to minimize the levelized cost of water (LCOW) employed in a reduced-order model-based simulation. Applying the optimal designs obtained from the surrogate optimization into the original comprehensive simulation resulted in an expected range of LCOW from $2.01 to $4.43 m -3 . Other established techno-economic and sustainability indicators further inform on process implications. The process was compared to current management practices of blowdown water treatment and produced water injection to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed cotreatment train designed for water reuse. The cotreatment process was estimated to have lower levelized treatment costs but require more chemicals and energy to manage a higher salinity wastewater than pure blowdown water alone. If sustainable management goals motivate produced water remediation, the cotreatment process can be beneficial for the broader scope of water management. • Blowdown and produced water cotreatment train is proposed for sustainable water use. • Comprehensive but computationally expensive models are established. • Modification of algorithms is performed for surrogate modeling and optimization. • Optimal cotreatment LCOW from $2.01 to $4.43 m −3 are obtained for different cases. • Multifaceted comparison of scenarios and conventional practices is carried out.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Desalination and Water Treatment
Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dwt.2024.100779
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Adsorption and Cooling Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Synergistic cotreatment of cooling tower blowdown and produced waters: Techno-economic, sustainability, and optimization systems analyses

Fernando V. Lima, Hunter Barber, Victor Alves
1 citations
Desalination and Water Treatment
Adsorption and Cooling Systems
0.21
article

Synergistic cotreatment of cooling tower blowdown and produced waters: Techno-economic, sustainability, and optimization systems analyses

Fernando V. Lima, Hunter Barber, Victor Alves
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A blowdown and produced water cotreatment train design was preliminarily simulated to explore water-energy nexus synergy. This process model was able to provide results concerning water compositions, chemical demand, and energy intensity. The computational expense associated with this simulation made it intractable to use within optimization algorithms for further informative, comprehensive systems analyses. This work details the efforts of developing a framework suitable for the optimization of computationally demanding wastewater treatment train simulations, specifically demonstrated for the cotreatment train’s process, economic, and sustainability models. The unique challenges of the cotreatment train model motivated a modified surrogate optimization methodology to be developed. Using this framework, worst and best case economic scenarios were optimized to minimize the levelized cost of water (LCOW) employed in a reduced-order model-based simulation. Applying the optimal designs obtained from the surrogate optimization into the original comprehensive simulation resulted in an expected range of LCOW from $2.01 to $4.43 m -3 . Other established techno-economic and sustainability indicators further inform on process implications. The process was compared to current management practices of blowdown water treatment and produced water injection to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed cotreatment train designed for water reuse. The cotreatment process was estimated to have lower levelized treatment costs but require more chemicals and energy to manage a higher salinity wastewater than pure blowdown water alone. If sustainable management goals motivate produced water remediation, the cotreatment process can be beneficial for the broader scope of water management. • Blowdown and produced water cotreatment train is proposed for sustainable water use. • Comprehensive but computationally expensive models are established. • Modification of algorithms is performed for surrogate modeling and optimization. • Optimal cotreatment LCOW from $2.01 to $4.43 m −3 are obtained for different cases. • Multifaceted comparison of scenarios and conventional practices is carried out.

Desalination and Water TreatmentVol. 320
West Virginia University (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy
Industry, innovation and infrastructure, Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Adsorption and Cooling Systems
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.