Allostatic Load, Cigarette Smoking, and Lung Cancer Risk

<b>Background:</b> Allostatic load (AL) is a biomarker of chronic stress associated with various chronic diseases. No study has evaluated the relationship between AL and lung cancer risk. <b>Methods:</b> To address this gap, we analyzed the association between AL and the development of lung cancer in 344,380 participants from the UK Biobank. <b>Results:</b> During the follow-up period from 2006 to 2020, 2517 participants were diagnosed with incident lung cancer. Participants who developed lung cancer had significantly higher AL compared to cancer-free controls (mean: 3.49 vs. 2.87, <i>p</i> < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, a marginally significant association was observed between higher AL and increased lung cancer risk (per one AL unit: Hazard Ratio [HR] = 1.02, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.99, 1.04). In the categorical analysis, individuals with high AL (AL > 2) had a 15% higher risk of lung cancer compared to those with low AL (AL ≤ 2) (HR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.25). Stratified analyses revealed that this increased risk was only observed in former (HR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.43) and current smokers (HR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.10, 1.42) but not in never-smokers (HR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.74, 1.17). Moreover, we found that demographics, socioeconomics, and other health behaviors could modify the risk association. Finally, among cigarette smoking-related variables, a significant trend of increasing AL was observed with higher pack-years, longer smoking duration, earlier age of smoking initiation, and later age of smoking cessation. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings suggest that higher AL is associated with an increased risk of lung cancer. The results need to be further confirmed in additional studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16183235
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Nutritional Studies and Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Allostatic Load, Cigarette Smoking, and Lung Cancer Risk

Bernard F. Fuemmeler, Hua Zhao, Kai Zhang, Yufan Guan et al.
2 citations
Cancers
Nutritional Studies and Diet
1.09
article

Allostatic Load, Cigarette Smoking, and Lung Cancer Risk

Bernard F. Fuemmeler, Hua Zhao, Kai Zhang, Yufan Guan, Jie Shen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Allostatic load (AL) is a biomarker of chronic stress associated with various chronic diseases. No study has evaluated the relationship between AL and lung cancer risk. <b>Methods:</b> To address this gap, we analyzed the association between AL and the development of lung cancer in 344,380 participants from the UK Biobank. <b>Results:</b> During the follow-up period from 2006 to 2020, 2517 participants were diagnosed with incident lung cancer. Participants who developed lung cancer had significantly higher AL compared to cancer-free controls (mean: 3.49 vs. 2.87, <i>p</i> < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, a marginally significant association was observed between higher AL and increased lung cancer risk (per one AL unit: Hazard Ratio [HR] = 1.02, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.99, 1.04). In the categorical analysis, individuals with high AL (AL > 2) had a 15% higher risk of lung cancer compared to those with low AL (AL ≤ 2) (HR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.25). Stratified analyses revealed that this increased risk was only observed in former (HR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.43) and current smokers (HR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.10, 1.42) but not in never-smokers (HR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.74, 1.17). Moreover, we found that demographics, socioeconomics, and other health behaviors could modify the risk association. Finally, among cigarette smoking-related variables, a significant trend of increasing AL was observed with higher pack-years, longer smoking duration, earlier age of smoking initiation, and later age of smoking cessation. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings suggest that higher AL is associated with an increased risk of lung cancer. The results need to be further confirmed in additional studies.

CancersVol. 16(18)
Virginia Commonwealth University (US), University at Albany, State University of New York (US), University of Virginia (US)
Virginia Commonwealth University, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Nutritional Studies and Diet
1.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.